2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal energy management of an underwater compressed air energy storage station using pumping systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…I‐CAES is an emerging technology, which does not require multiple stages of compression, cooling, heating, and expansion of air, compared with conventional CAES. I‐CAES eliminates the use of auxiliary storage systems, air compressors, and air turbines, as are used in conventional CAES, and, rather, uses the liquid piston machinery which compresses the air more efficiently (compression efficiency up to 95%); subsequently, overall efficiency of 70% can be obtained …”
Section: Energy Storage Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…I‐CAES is an emerging technology, which does not require multiple stages of compression, cooling, heating, and expansion of air, compared with conventional CAES. I‐CAES eliminates the use of auxiliary storage systems, air compressors, and air turbines, as are used in conventional CAES, and, rather, uses the liquid piston machinery which compresses the air more efficiently (compression efficiency up to 95%); subsequently, overall efficiency of 70% can be obtained …”
Section: Energy Storage Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I-CAES eliminates the use of auxiliary storage systems, air compressors, and air turbines, as are used in conventional CAES, and, rather, uses the liquid piston machinery which compresses the air more efficiently (compression efficiency up to 95%); subsequently, overall efficiency of 70% can be obtained. 58,59 The salient features of CAES technology include its large storage capacity (up to 500 MW) and lifetime (20-40 years and 30 000+ cycles), which is comparable to PHES. Also, the overall efficiency of conventional CAES is around 40% and goes as high as 80% in case of some advanced CAES technologies.…”
Section: Compressed Air Energy Storagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Camargos et al built a simplified prototype of isobaric hydro‐pneumatic concept and found that an experimental conversion efficiency of 45% was approached. Maisonnave et al designed an isothermal and isobaric hydro‐pneumatic storage system by introducing the liquid piston concept and UWCAES concept as shown in Figure .Besides the aforementioned CAES for storing marine renewable energies, the Keuka Energy Company proposed to integrate LAES with offshore wind turbines on a floating V‐shaped platform that could contain liquid air. Currently, a 125‐kW 1:100 prototype system has been completed and a 25 MW project has been scheduled.…”
Section: Mre Storagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was found that a round‐trip efficiency of approximately 71% could be achieved. On the basis of the basic UWCAES system, Maisonnave et al further developed an isothermal UWCAES concept by integrating a hydro‐pneumatic hybrid system. To date, most studies focused on the system design and efficiency evaluation based on either energy or exergy analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%