2018 North American Power Symposium (NAPS) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/naps.2018.8600638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Energy Storage Sizing and Siting in Hybrid AC/DC Microgrids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike the conventional unit commitment problem which depends on a priori information, this method is not as more suitable for practical implementation as it does not require prior RES and load information. A day ahead unit commitment operation is solved in [81] using a heuristic optimization technique to minimize the total operation cost and carbon dioxide while scheduling the [56] Battery cost minimization total energy consumption is reduced reliability is not improved load management and ESS location MILP [57]- [59] Not specified cost minimization (investment and operation) reduction in power conversion loss -DE [60], [61] battery and supercapacitor battery life cycle maximization and cost minimization the microgrids configuration is optimized SOC is not well managed Compro mise Programming (CP) [62] battery daily worth maximization and cost minimization effective sizing with minimal cost system operational requirements are not considered PSO [63]- [65] battery minimization of annualized capital cost, and operation loss of power supply probability is reduced, assumption is made based on & maintenance cost limited RES sensitive analysis [66] not specified maximization control performance and optimal node selection for ESS variation of the grid constructions minimization power losses mitigation of power and energy variation and parameters are not considered GWO [67], [68] battery minimization net present cost optimized configuration is selected -DP optimization [69] vanadium redox battery ESS cost load uncertainty improvement PQ issues are unsolved NSGA-II [70] hybrid SMES-flywheel maximize the power delivered, cost reduction and performance improvement solution procedure is minimize power fluctuation and costs time-consuming probabilistic approach [71], [72] battery investment cost minimization optimal size of battery when time-of-use sensitivity analysis with random (ToU) is used uncertainties are well handled input variables should be investigated linear programming [73] hydrogen storage cost and carbon emission minimization reduced carbon emission size of hydrogen storage is larger than battery power among different microgrids units. This approach also effectively eliminates congestion according to congestion signals by optimally scheduling different units.…”
Section: A Unit Commitmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the conventional unit commitment problem which depends on a priori information, this method is not as more suitable for practical implementation as it does not require prior RES and load information. A day ahead unit commitment operation is solved in [81] using a heuristic optimization technique to minimize the total operation cost and carbon dioxide while scheduling the [56] Battery cost minimization total energy consumption is reduced reliability is not improved load management and ESS location MILP [57]- [59] Not specified cost minimization (investment and operation) reduction in power conversion loss -DE [60], [61] battery and supercapacitor battery life cycle maximization and cost minimization the microgrids configuration is optimized SOC is not well managed Compro mise Programming (CP) [62] battery daily worth maximization and cost minimization effective sizing with minimal cost system operational requirements are not considered PSO [63]- [65] battery minimization of annualized capital cost, and operation loss of power supply probability is reduced, assumption is made based on & maintenance cost limited RES sensitive analysis [66] not specified maximization control performance and optimal node selection for ESS variation of the grid constructions minimization power losses mitigation of power and energy variation and parameters are not considered GWO [67], [68] battery minimization net present cost optimized configuration is selected -DP optimization [69] vanadium redox battery ESS cost load uncertainty improvement PQ issues are unsolved NSGA-II [70] hybrid SMES-flywheel maximize the power delivered, cost reduction and performance improvement solution procedure is minimize power fluctuation and costs time-consuming probabilistic approach [71], [72] battery investment cost minimization optimal size of battery when time-of-use sensitivity analysis with random (ToU) is used uncertainties are well handled input variables should be investigated linear programming [73] hydrogen storage cost and carbon emission minimization reduced carbon emission size of hydrogen storage is larger than battery power among different microgrids units. This approach also effectively eliminates congestion according to congestion signals by optimally scheduling different units.…”
Section: A Unit Commitmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper also considered the forced outage rates of solar, wind and utilization factor of battery energy storage systems to make the design more realistic. [20] determined the energy sources unit location and optimal power of a hybrid AC/DC system by formulating as a mixed-integer linear programming and solved by using CPLEX optimization studio includes total cost minimization. The proposed work in [21] determines not only the optimal configuration of renewable sources but also the power electronic converters needed in the hybrid microgrid.…”
Section: Optimal Sizing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been several studies reported in the open literature regarding the sizing and siting of DGs for achieving multiple objectives in ac power systems, [12,13] as well as in dc MGs [5,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21], while some examples of actual experimental dc MGs can be found in [22][23][24][25][26][27]. The sizing of various components of solar-based dc MGs was studied in [15,16], in which a framework was proposed for the optimal size selection of photovoltaic panels, energy storage devices, and conductors.…”
Section: Literature Review and Research Gapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comprehensive MG planning methodology was proposed in [25], where the problem of sizing and placement of photovoltaic arrays and ESSs is solved for a rural area in Cambodia. The sizing and siting of ESSs in hybrid ac/dc microgrids was studied in [26], where the MILP approach is used to reduce the total operation cost of the system for different scenarios. The simultaneous sizing and siting of the DGs has also been studied in [20,21], using various methods and under different objectives.…”
Section: Literature Review and Research Gapsmentioning
confidence: 99%