2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2006.00754
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Equilibria for Multi-dimensional Time-inconsistent Stopping Problems

Yu-Jui Huang,
Zhenhua Wang

Abstract: We study an optimal stopping problem under non-exponential discounting, where the state process is a multi-dimensional continuous strong Markov process. The discount function is taken to be log sub-additive, capturing decreasing impatience in behavioral economics. On strength of probabilistic potential theory, we establish the existence of an optimal equilibrium among a sufficiently large collection of equilibria, consisting of finely closed equilibria satisfying a boundary condition. This generalizes the exis… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As discussed in the above, immediate stop is always a mild equilibrium; so it is expected that there exist multiple mild intra-personal equilibrium stopping rules; see Huang and Nguyen-Huu (2018) and . To address the issue of multiplicity, and Huang and Wang (2020) consider, in the setting of an infinite-horizon, continuoustime optimal stopping under nonexponential discounting, the "optimal" mild intra-personal equilibrium stopping rule τ * which achieves the maximum of J(t, x; τ ) over τ ∈ E for all t ∈ [0, T ), x ∈ X, where E is the set of all mild intra-personal equilibrium stopping rules. Bayraktar et al (2021) compare mild intra-personal equilibrium stopping rules with weak (respectively strong) intra-personal equilibrium stopping rules obtained by embedding optimal stopping into stochastic control and then applying Definition 2 (respectively Definition 3).…”
Section: Optimal Stoppingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed in the above, immediate stop is always a mild equilibrium; so it is expected that there exist multiple mild intra-personal equilibrium stopping rules; see Huang and Nguyen-Huu (2018) and . To address the issue of multiplicity, and Huang and Wang (2020) consider, in the setting of an infinite-horizon, continuoustime optimal stopping under nonexponential discounting, the "optimal" mild intra-personal equilibrium stopping rule τ * which achieves the maximum of J(t, x; τ ) over τ ∈ E for all t ∈ [0, T ), x ∈ X, where E is the set of all mild intra-personal equilibrium stopping rules. Bayraktar et al (2021) compare mild intra-personal equilibrium stopping rules with weak (respectively strong) intra-personal equilibrium stopping rules obtained by embedding optimal stopping into stochastic control and then applying Definition 2 (respectively Definition 3).…”
Section: Optimal Stoppingmentioning
confidence: 99%