2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10107-018-1304-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal estimation of sensor biases for asynchronous multi-sensor data fusion

Abstract: An important step in a multi-sensor surveillance system is to estimate sensor biases from their noisy asynchronous measurements. This estimation problem is computationally challenging due to the highly nonlinear transformation between the global and local coordinate systems as well as the measurement asynchrony from different sensors. In this paper, we propose a novel nonlinear least squares (LS) formulation for the problem by assuming the existence of a reference target moving with an (unknown) constant veloc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method has been extended in [96] to asynchronous sensors. The case of asynchronous sensors has also been considered in [97] where the registration problem has been tackled by non-linear optimization assuming a target with a nearly-constantvelocity model.…”
Section: Registration Error Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method has been extended in [96] to asynchronous sensors. The case of asynchronous sensors has also been considered in [97] where the registration problem has been tackled by non-linear optimization assuming a target with a nearly-constantvelocity model.…”
Section: Registration Error Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Problem (CQP) finds many important signal processing applications, including multi-input multi-output (MIMO) detection [2], [3], unimodular radar code design [4], [5], [6], virtual beamforming [7], phase recovery [8], sensor bias estimation [9], and angular synchronization [10]; see Section II further ahead. For more applications of problem (CQP) in signal processing and communications, please refer to [11] and [12] and references therein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of existing algorithms for solving problem (CQP) are approximation algorithms, local optimization algorithms, or other heuristics (e.g., [3], [4], [5], [8], [10], [11], [13], [14], [19], [20], [21]). These algorithms generally cannot guarantee to find the global solutions of problem (CQP), except only for some special cases [9], [10], [22], [23]. A straightforward way of globally solving problem (CQP) is to first reformulate the problem as an equivalent real QP by representing the complex variables by their real and imaginary components and then apply the existing general-purpose global algorithms (e.g., algorithms proposed in [24], [25]) for solving the equivalent real reformulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last two decades, the semidefinite relaxation (SDR) based algorithms have been widely studied in the signal processing and wireless communication community [26]. For various SDR based algorithms for problems (CQP) and (UQP) under different signal processing and wireless communication scenarios, we refer the interested reader to [2,14,15,13,18,23,25,27,28,31,35,40,44,47] and the references therein. The SDR based algorithms generally perform very well in some signal processing and wireless communication applications, as pointed out in [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%