2006
DOI: 10.1080/14697680500510662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal exercise strategies for corporate warrants

Abstract: In this paper, we analyse the optimal exercise strategies for corporate warrants issued by levered firms. For the analysis, we distinguish between two exercise variants, namely the traditional block exercise and competitive exercise in equilibrium. We find that the optimal exercise date under the block condition can be before or after an optimal exercise in equilibrium. Surprisingly, optimal block exercise can occur even without any dividend payments in contrast to the competitive exercise. As a consequence, t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, Linder and Trautmann (2009) provide sufficient conditions for sequential exercise not to be optimal. If warrant holders are price takers, Constantinides (1984) and Koziol (2006) show that there exist Nash equilibrium where price takers will exercise warrants as a block, although the price will be less than or equal to that of a large trader. In these models, the results depend critically on both the use of the cash proceeds by the firm and the specific liability structure assumed.…”
Section: The Structural Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Linder and Trautmann (2009) provide sufficient conditions for sequential exercise not to be optimal. If warrant holders are price takers, Constantinides (1984) and Koziol (2006) show that there exist Nash equilibrium where price takers will exercise warrants as a block, although the price will be less than or equal to that of a large trader. In these models, the results depend critically on both the use of the cash proceeds by the firm and the specific liability structure assumed.…”
Section: The Structural Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…K comes from equating the assets and liabilities of the firm. At each node k , we must have the asset liability identity: (10) Where N is the number of shares outstanding and i K is the number of warrants of type i that were issued.…”
Section: Pricing Multiple Warrantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Articles on warrant valuation which rely on the reasonableness of block exercise include Ingersoll (1977), Brennan andSchwartz(1977, 1980), Schulz and Trautmann(1994), and Crouhy and Galai(1994). examines exercise strategies for warrants in a competitive market [16]. Kapadia and Willette(2005) analyze exercise strategies for Europeantype warrants in large trader economies when large trader hold the same number of warrants while Linder and Trautmann(2006) consider the more general case of large traders with a competitive fringe [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…one particular warrant holder cannot affect the aggregate exercise volume f · m with his or her individual decision. This form of competition among warrant holders is also considered by Constantinides (1984) and Koziol (2006a).…”
Section: Imperfect Information About the Firm Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remarkably, if a partial exercise takes place, the exercise volume declines with the signal v . This relationship is surprising because typically the optimal exercise volume increases with a more favourable firm value (see, for example Koziol, 2006a). The intuition for this outcome is that in this equilibrium the warrant holders – as explained above – suffer from a lower aggregate exercise volume and benefit from a more favourable signal v .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%