2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0260-8774(00)00142-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal experimental design for the parameter estimation of conduction heated foods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Poulsen (1982) and Martínez-Monzó, Barat, González-Martínez, Chiralt, and Fito (2000) measured thermal conductivity based on the solution of one-dimensional transient heat conduction equation for infinite cylinder subjected to constant surface temperature using only the first term of Fourier's series solution utilizing regression analysis. Recently there is great interest in simultaneous estimation of thermal conductivity and heat capacity (Nahor, Scheerlinck, Van Impe, & Nicolaı, 2003;Nahor, Scheerlinck, Verniest, De Baerdemaeker, & Nicolaı, 2001;Zhu et al, 2007). The objectives of this research work were: to develop a computer program for simultaneous estimation of thermal conductivity and volumetric heat capacity from transient temperature measurements using sequential parameter estimation technique, to use Monte Carlo simulation to validate the computer algorithm and to investigate the effect of sensor position, measurement error and heating time on parameter estimation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Poulsen (1982) and Martínez-Monzó, Barat, González-Martínez, Chiralt, and Fito (2000) measured thermal conductivity based on the solution of one-dimensional transient heat conduction equation for infinite cylinder subjected to constant surface temperature using only the first term of Fourier's series solution utilizing regression analysis. Recently there is great interest in simultaneous estimation of thermal conductivity and heat capacity (Nahor, Scheerlinck, Van Impe, & Nicolaı, 2003;Nahor, Scheerlinck, Verniest, De Baerdemaeker, & Nicolaı, 2001;Zhu et al, 2007). The objectives of this research work were: to develop a computer program for simultaneous estimation of thermal conductivity and volumetric heat capacity from transient temperature measurements using sequential parameter estimation technique, to use Monte Carlo simulation to validate the computer algorithm and to investigate the effect of sensor position, measurement error and heating time on parameter estimation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…on the data. For more details, the reader is referred to Nahor et al (2001). The WRSS was considered as a criterion for the parameter estimation/optimization.…”
Section: Submucosa (Sm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, identifiability of thermophysical parameters requires heat generation input profiles ensuring that the effect of measurement uncertainties are minimized, resulting in robust parameter estimates. In previous research (Nahor et al, 2001(Nahor et al, , 2003 it was shown that in case of traditional heating strategies with constant heat generation profiles and noise corrupted temperature responses an estimation procedure might result in parameter estimates which deviate from the real physical parameter values to a large extent. Aiming at a simultaneous estimation of conduction heat transfer parameters we are left with the question whether the numerical values of the estimates correspond to physically meaningful heat transfer parameters or not.…”
Section: Optimal Experimental Design (Oed)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent interests are directed towards the simultaneous estimation of the thermal conductivity and heat capacity by means of single or dual heat probe methods (Bristow, Bilskie, Kluitenberg, & Horton, 1995;Bristow, Kluitenberg, & Horton, 1994;Muramatsu, Tagawa, Kasai, Sakai, & Fukushima, 1999;Nahor, Scheerlinck, Verniest, De Baerdemaeker, & Nicolaï , 2001;Nahor, Scheerlinck, Van Impe, & Nicolaı¨, 2003;Tagawa, Kitamura, Muramatsu, & Murata, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%