2017
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1712.01774
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Fast Johnson-Lindenstrauss Embeddings for Large Data Sets

Abstract: We introduce a new fast construction of a Johnson-Lindenstrauss matrix based on the composition of the following two embeddings: A fast construction by the second author joint with Ward [1] maps points into a space of lower, but not optimal dimension. Then a subsequent transformation by a dense matrix with independent entries reaches an optimal embedding dimension.As we show in this note, the computational cost of applying this transform simultaneously to all points in a large data set comes close to the compl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More explicitely if 𝑓 1 : R 𝑑 β†’ R 𝑑 β€² and 𝑓 2 : R 𝑑 β€² β†’ R π‘š with π‘š β‰ͺ 𝑑 β€² β‰ͺ 𝑑 are two JLTs and computing 𝑓 1 (π‘₯) is fast, we could hope that computing ( 𝑓 2 β€’ 𝑓 1 )(π‘₯) is fast as well as 𝑓 2 only need to handle 𝑑 β€² dimensional vectors and hope that ( 𝑓 2 β€’ 𝑓 1 ) preserves the norm sufficiently well since both 𝑓 1 and 𝑓 2 approximately preserve norms individually. As presented here, the obvious candidate for 𝑓 1 is one of the RIP-based JLDs, which was succesfully applied in [BK17]. In their construction, which we will refer to as GRHD28, 𝑓 1 is the SRHT and 𝑓 2 is the dense Rademacher construction (i.e.…”
Section: Structured Johnson-lindenstrauss Transformsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More explicitely if 𝑓 1 : R 𝑑 β†’ R 𝑑 β€² and 𝑓 2 : R 𝑑 β€² β†’ R π‘š with π‘š β‰ͺ 𝑑 β€² β‰ͺ 𝑑 are two JLTs and computing 𝑓 1 (π‘₯) is fast, we could hope that computing ( 𝑓 2 β€’ 𝑓 1 )(π‘₯) is fast as well as 𝑓 2 only need to handle 𝑑 β€² dimensional vectors and hope that ( 𝑓 2 β€’ 𝑓 1 ) preserves the norm sufficiently well since both 𝑓 1 and 𝑓 2 approximately preserve norms individually. As presented here, the obvious candidate for 𝑓 1 is one of the RIP-based JLDs, which was succesfully applied in [BK17]. In their construction, which we will refer to as GRHD28, 𝑓 1 is the SRHT and 𝑓 2 is the dense Rademacher construction (i.e.…”
Section: Structured Johnson-lindenstrauss Transformsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let 𝐴 be a π‘š Γ— 𝑛 matrix and 𝐡 be a 𝑝 Γ— π‘ž matrix, then the Kronecker product 27 Curiously, the hard instances for the Toeplitz construction are very similar to the hard instances for Feature Hashing used in [FKL18]. 28 Due to the choice of matrix names in [BK17].…”
Section: Structured Johnson-lindenstrauss Transformsmentioning
confidence: 99%