2021
DOI: 10.1086/713191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Fiscal Policy without Commitment: Revisiting Lucas-Stokey

Abstract: According to the Lucas-Stokey result, a government can structure its debt maturity to guarantee commitment to optimal fiscal policy by future governments. In this paper, we overturn this conclusion, showing that it does not generally hold in the same model and under the same definition of time-consistency as in Lucas-Stokey. Our argument rests on the existence of an overlooked commitment problem that cannot be remedied with debt maturity: a government in the future will not necessarily tax above the peak of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lucas and Stokey (1983) argue that there is no distortion due to lack of commitment, since the government can structure its debt maturity to guarantee commitment to optimal fiscal policy by future governments. 5 However, Debortoli et al (2021) show that this result does not generally hold in the same model as Lucas and Stokey (1983). As such, our analysis of optimal fiscal policy considers the entire set of MPCE's, not only the ones which coincide with the commitment policy (should they exist).…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 92%
“…Lucas and Stokey (1983) argue that there is no distortion due to lack of commitment, since the government can structure its debt maturity to guarantee commitment to optimal fiscal policy by future governments. 5 However, Debortoli et al (2021) show that this result does not generally hold in the same model as Lucas and Stokey (1983). As such, our analysis of optimal fiscal policy considers the entire set of MPCE's, not only the ones which coincide with the commitment policy (should they exist).…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 92%
“…For a review of optimal fiscal policy setups in general, the reader is referred to the studies by Werning (2007), and Schmitt-Grohe and Uribe (2007), as well as to the references therein. Lastly, a very recent study by Debortoli et al. (2021) covers the case without commitment, which is outside the scope of the current paper.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This discourages governments from issuing these instruments . 5 Lack of commitment to fiscal policy can induce governments facing an adverse budget shock to manipulate tax rates to alter intertemporal consumption levels in favor of reducing the market value of debt (Debortoli et al, 2017(Debortoli et al, , 2021. This creates an additional drawback when applying the theoretical recommendations of Angeletos ( 2002) and Buera and Nicolini (2004).…”
Section: N O T E Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, real securities with longer maturities are recommended under a set of assumptions in the models of Angeletos (2002) and Buera and Nicolini (2004). Nevertheless, these recommendations are refuted in later studies, which argue in favor of shortening debt maturity when the costs associated with longer maturities outweigh the benefits of insurance (Debortoli et al., 2017, 2021).…”
Section: Public Debt Composition: An Optimal Taxation Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%