2011
DOI: 10.2514/1.52484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Formation Design for Magnetospheric Multiscale Mission Using Differential Orbital Elements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The first track originates from an STM derived by Gim and Alfriend that includes first-order secular and osculating J 2 effects in arbitrarily eccentric orbits [20]. This STM was used in the design process for NASA's MMS mission [21] and is employed in the maneuver-planning algorithm of NASA's CubeSat proximity operations demonstration mission [22]. A similar STM was later derived for a fully nonsingular ROE state [23] and more recent works have expanded this approach to include higher-order zonal geopotential harmonics [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first track originates from an STM derived by Gim and Alfriend that includes first-order secular and osculating J 2 effects in arbitrarily eccentric orbits [20]. This STM was used in the design process for NASA's MMS mission [21] and is employed in the maneuver-planning algorithm of NASA's CubeSat proximity operations demonstration mission [22]. A similar STM was later derived for a fully nonsingular ROE state [23] and more recent works have expanded this approach to include higher-order zonal geopotential harmonics [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies on design [6][7][8][9][10], guidance [11][12][13], navigation [14][15][16][17], and control [18][19][20][21][22] of spacecraft formations are widely available in the literature. More comprehensive reviews of these studies can be found in recent survey papers [23][24][25][26].…”
Section: B State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of these missions, the MMS, will operate in an orbit with a semi-major axis of a ¼ 42,905 km and eccentricities varying between e ¼ 0.81818 and e ¼ 0.9084. 12 Closed aperture formations operating in Molniya orbits with a ¼ 46,000 km and e ¼ 0.67 have been proposed for distributed Earth imaging applications. 13 Although, at these high orbits, the specific magnitude of the J 2 gravity perturbation is on the order of 1 Â 10 À6 N/kg, differences in the mean orbital element drift rates of the chief and deputy spacecraft can cause formation drift on the order of 1-100 m/orbit, depending on the formation.…”
Section: J2 Drift For Formations In Eccentric Orbitsmentioning
confidence: 99%