2020
DOI: 10.1080/0305215x.2019.1695790
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal generation scheduling in microgrids using mixed-integer second-order cone programming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cost of exchanging the electrical power with the upstream grid is formulated by () as follows [26]: CostGrid(t)=πE(t)×PGrid(t)tT …”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The cost of exchanging the electrical power with the upstream grid is formulated by () as follows [26]: CostGrid(t)=πE(t)×PGrid(t)tT …”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where EENS is written as follows [22]: ðh; iÞ is an extra electrical power discharging during the contingencies based on the contract between DNO and PEV's owner and it is denoted as [26]:…”
Section: Objective Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cost of exchanging electrical power with the upstream grid is formulated by (22) as follows 26 : CostGrid()t=πE()t×PGrid()ttT. Installation cost of IPLs consists of two terms including fixed costs and variable costs as (23). The fixed costs include municipal and construction license payment to install the IPL.…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• CASE A: Minimisation of active power generation cost alone (using HTSW scheduling) [32][33][34] • CASE B: Maximisation of ATC along with minimisation of active power generation cost with renewable energy sources (multi-objective).…”
Section: Problem Formulation Of Atc Along With Htsw Schedulingmentioning
confidence: 99%