2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-006-0262-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal image reconstruction intervals for non-invasive coronary angiography with 64-slice CT

Abstract: The reconstruction intervals providing best image quality for non-invasive coronary angiography with 64-slice computed tomography (CT) were evaluated. Contrastenhanced, retrospectively electrocardiography (ECG)-gated 64-slice CT coronary angiography was performed in 80 patients (47 male, 33 female; mean age 62.1±10.6 years). Thirteen data sets were reconstructed in 5% increments from 20 to 80% of the R-R interval. Depending on the average heart rate during scanning, patients were grouped as <65 bpm (n=49) and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
77
4
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
5
77
4
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The images in that phase showing least motion artifacts were used for further analysis. As previously reported [21], the optimal reconstruction phase was found at 60% and 65% of the R-R interval, with the individual %-interval presenting the beginning of the reconstruction. All data were transferred to a remote workstation (Leonardo with Syngo InSpace4D application, Siemens, Forchheim, Germany) for further post-processing.…”
Section: −1mentioning
confidence: 49%
“…The images in that phase showing least motion artifacts were used for further analysis. As previously reported [21], the optimal reconstruction phase was found at 60% and 65% of the R-R interval, with the individual %-interval presenting the beginning of the reconstruction. All data were transferred to a remote workstation (Leonardo with Syngo InSpace4D application, Siemens, Forchheim, Germany) for further post-processing.…”
Section: −1mentioning
confidence: 49%
“…18 If motion artefacts were present, additional reconstructions in 5% increments and decrements were rendered, as described. 5,[19][20][21][22] For image reconstruction, a slice thickness of 0.6 mm and an increment of 0.3 mm were chosen. As performed by Flohr et al, reconstructions were rendered by using a medium-sharp (B26F) convolution kernel.…”
Section: Image Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If motion artifacts were present, additional reconstructions in 5% increments and decrements of the R-R interval were performed, as described earlier. 13,17,18,22 …”
Section: Image Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%