2017
DOI: 10.21144/wp17-11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal incentive contracts with job destruction risk

Abstract: We study the implications of job destruction risk for optimal incentives in a long-term contract with moral hazard. We extend the dynamic principal-agent model of Sannikov (2008) by adding an exogenous Poisson shock that makes the match between the firm and the agent permanently unproductive. In modeling job destruction as an exogenous Poisson shock, we follow the Diamond-Mortensen-Pissarides search-and-matching literature. The optimal contract shows how job destruction risk is shared between the firm and the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our analysis, we assume buyer agent commission rate B is exogenously given, and we do not take a stand on the exact reason why the prevailing rate is at 3%. 10…”
Section: Model Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In our analysis, we assume buyer agent commission rate B is exogenously given, and we do not take a stand on the exact reason why the prevailing rate is at 3%. 10…”
Section: Model Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our quantitative exercises, we consider both cases where S = 3% or S = 1%, and the welfare …ndings are similar. 10 It is possible that 3% is a focal point established by historical reasons for real estate agents to collude, or it is the constrained pro…t-maximizing rate above which customers may switch to alternative home search and matching options. Our analysis is consistent with either explanation.…”
Section: Market Equilibriummentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the financial market a great attention to the theory of market failures has been received after 2008's economic and financial crisis (e.g. Besley, 2010;Allen & Carletti, 2013;Grochulski & Morrison, 2014). Special attention received necessity for the macroprudential regulation as systemic risks were identified on top of financial risks faced by individual companies (Allen & Carletti, 2013;Grochulski & Morrison, 2014).…”
Section: Market Failures and Regulationmentioning
confidence: 99%