2018
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3228657
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Income Taxation in Unionized Labor Markets

Abstract: This paper extends the Diamond (1980) model with labor unions to study optimal income taxation and to analyze whether unions can be desirable for income redistribution. Unions bargain with firms over wages in each sector and firms unilaterally determine employment. Unions raise the efficiency costs of income redistribution, because unemployment benefits and income taxes raise wage demands and thereby generate involuntary unemployment. Optimal unemployment benefits and optimal income taxes are lower in unionize… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“… See also Hummel and Jacobs (), who demonstrate that labour unions can be desirable for income redistribution to alleviate the distortions of excessive labour participation caused by participation subsidies. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… See also Hummel and Jacobs (), who demonstrate that labour unions can be desirable for income redistribution to alleviate the distortions of excessive labour participation caused by participation subsidies. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Albeit small by comparison, a body of literature on optimal redistributive taxation under unemployment has gradually evolved during the latest decades, in which the incentives underlying an optimal tax policy partly differ from those following under perfect competition. The major mechanisms generating unemployment in these studies are trade‐union wage formation (e.g., Aronsson and Sjögren, 2003, 2004; Aronsson et al ., 2009; Hummel and Jacobs, 2018), minimum wages (Marceau and Boadway, 1994), and search frictions (Lehmann et al ., 2011). Although fundamentally different, a common denominator is a policy incentive to reduce the level of unemployment, which is likely to result in higher marginal tax rates than under perfect competition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper is related to a small strand of the literature that considers optimal taxation in the presence of involuntary unemployment. These studies consider different sources of unemployment, ranging from minimum wages (e.g., Allen, 1987;Guesnerie and Roberts, 1987;Marceau and Boadway, 1994;Boadway and Cuff, 2001;Lee and Saez, 2012;Gerritsen and Jacobs, 2015), to union-set wages (e.g., Sørensen, 1999;Aronsson and Sjögren, 2004;Hummel and Jacobs, 2016), to downward rigid wage floors (e.g., Landais, Michaillat, and Saez, 2013;Kroft et al, 2015). Most of these studies consider identical agents so that the efficiency of labor rationing plays no role of significance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%