2004
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.618981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Income Taxation, Public-Goods Provision and Public-Sector Pricing: A Contribution to the Foundations of Public Economics

Abstract: The paper develops an integrated model of optimal nonlinear income taxation, public-goods provision and pricing in a large economy with private information about labour productivities and public-goods preferences and with binding participation constraints and/or distributive concerns. With binding participation constraints, it is desirable to use nonlinear income taxes as well as admission fees for public-goods …nance. With (su¢ ciently large) inequality aversion, it is desirable to use admission fees as well … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given these considerations, I refer to an allocation as third-best if and only if it maximizes the aggregate surplus (2.8) over the set of all feasible, incentive-compatible, individually rational, and renegotiation proof allocations. 17 To de…ne renegotiation proofness formally, I say that a net-trade allocation for private-good consumption and public-good admission tickets is an array (z c ( ; ); z 1 ( ; ); :::; z m ( ; )) such that for each ( ; ! ); z c ( ; !)…”
Section: Renegotiation Proofness and The Optimality Of Ramsey-boiteuxmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given these considerations, I refer to an allocation as third-best if and only if it maximizes the aggregate surplus (2.8) over the set of all feasible, incentive-compatible, individually rational, and renegotiation proof allocations. 17 To de…ne renegotiation proofness formally, I say that a net-trade allocation for private-good consumption and public-good admission tickets is an array (z c ( ; ); z 1 ( ; ); :::; z m ( ; )) such that for each ( ; ! ); z c ( ; !)…”
Section: Renegotiation Proofness and The Optimality Of Ramsey-boiteuxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, (2.16) is incompatible with the requirement that the social marginal utility of private-good consumption be equalized across agents. See Hellwig (2005Hellwig ( , 2004. 1 1 This speci…cation encompasses the requirement that nobody should have an incentive to reject the proposed allocation in order to consume his own output Y and at the same time to enjoy the public goods provided by others?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The production efficiency lemma of Diamond and Mirrlees (1971) states conditions under which the nonsatiation property is satisfied in an economy with linear taxation. This property is also valid with non-linear taxation in the Mirrlees (1971) setup, under the single-crossing condition (Hellwig (2007)). It seems plausible that second best optima are locally non-satiated in fairly general circumstances, for instance in the absence of single-crossing under multidimensional heterogeneity.…”
Section: A Non-satiation Propertymentioning
confidence: 71%
“…It is possible to have more heterogeneity in tastes for public good, as in Hellwig (2008b). Indeed, when preferences take the form u(φ(c), ) + ψ(g, ζ), the incentive constraints are independent of the heterogeneity ζ.…”
Section: Public Good Provisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation