2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jedc.2012.03.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal investment in learning-curve technologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We consider a company that is risk‐neutral and discounted with a risk‐free rate r, which has the option to invest in EVs with uncertain future revenue streams. Once the traditional manufacturer decides to invest in EVs, the company immediately begins producing EVs, with an investment cost of I=iK1, where K1 represents the capacity level and i represents the investment cost of one unit (Della Seta et al, 2012; Hagspiel et al, 2021). To be as realistic as possible, we assume that the production cost of EVs is larger than that of FVs and the company's production reached capacity K1.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider a company that is risk‐neutral and discounted with a risk‐free rate r, which has the option to invest in EVs with uncertain future revenue streams. Once the traditional manufacturer decides to invest in EVs, the company immediately begins producing EVs, with an investment cost of I=iK1, where K1 represents the capacity level and i represents the investment cost of one unit (Della Seta et al, 2012; Hagspiel et al, 2021). To be as realistic as possible, we assume that the production cost of EVs is larger than that of FVs and the company's production reached capacity K1.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we formalize these considerations into a model for bank loans and account for learning spillovers by building on a recent strand of literature that incorporates learning effects into models of individual investors' technology investment decisions. In particular, Della Seta et al (2012) model a novel technology whose marginal costs decrease in cumulative output and find that optimal investment involves significant initial losses that are compensated by later-stage gains, making the technology particularly prone to downside risk. Their model is extended by Sarkar and Zhang (2020), who introduce the option of debt-financing, which leads to more and earlier investment.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that we use capitalized L for aggregates of loan amounts across banks and lowercase l for loan amounts of individual banks.3 Our restrictions that c ≥ 0, c ′ < 0, c ′′ > 0 nest the most common functional forms for technological and financial learning curves in the literature(Della Seta et al, 2012;Egli et al, 2018;Samadi, 2018;Thompson, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, if the realized demand is high, a large capacity will generate a high revenue. Since Bar-Ilan and Strange (1999) and Dangl (1999) develop real options models to study the capacity choice for an individual firm, a considerable number of papers have investigated the timing-capacity optimization in various dynamic investment settings (see, e.g., Azevedo et al, 2021;Della Seta et al, 2012;Hagspiel et al, 2016;Sarkar, 2021;Sarkar & Zhang, 2020;Paxson et al, 2022;Wen et al, 2017). In these studies, demand uncertainty is characterized by a geometric Brownian motion (GBM) process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%