Abstract:We consider an optimal investment problem with intermediate consumption and random endowment, in an incomplete semimartingale model of the financial market. We establish the key assertions of the utility maximization theory, assuming that both primal and dual value functions are finite in the interiors of their domains and that the random endowment at maturity can be dominated by the terminal value of a self-financing wealth process. In order to facilitate the verification of these conditions, we present alter… Show more
“…[6,17]). In general, the first-order condition is only guaranteed to hold for a dual variable from a larger class of supermartingale densities, compare [18,19,31]. However, it is often satisfied in concrete examples, cf., e.g., [5,11].…”
Section: A Sufficient Condition For Optimalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dual considerations in the proof of Theorem 4.1 also show thatẐ is first-order optimal for the minimization problem dual to 2.3 (cf. [18,19,31,14] for more details. )…”
Section: First-order Optimalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Existence, uniqueness, and duality for problems of this kind are well understood, even in more general settings that also allow for investment in a financial market. See, e.g., [18,19,31] and the references therein. In contrast, beyond standard utilities and very particular endowment streams (see, e.g.…”
Please refer to published version for the most recent bibliographic citation information. If a published version is known of, the repository item page linked to above, will contain details on accessing it.
“…[6,17]). In general, the first-order condition is only guaranteed to hold for a dual variable from a larger class of supermartingale densities, compare [18,19,31]. However, it is often satisfied in concrete examples, cf., e.g., [5,11].…”
Section: A Sufficient Condition For Optimalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dual considerations in the proof of Theorem 4.1 also show thatẐ is first-order optimal for the minimization problem dual to 2.3 (cf. [18,19,31,14] for more details. )…”
Section: First-order Optimalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Existence, uniqueness, and duality for problems of this kind are well understood, even in more general settings that also allow for investment in a financial market. See, e.g., [18,19,31] and the references therein. In contrast, beyond standard utilities and very particular endowment streams (see, e.g.…”
Please refer to published version for the most recent bibliographic citation information. If a published version is known of, the repository item page linked to above, will contain details on accessing it.
“…• In the theory of large financial markets, our approach is the first to tackle utility maximization for U finite on R (the case of U defined on (0,∞) was first considered in [11]; subsequently [20] treated random endowments in the same setting), see Section 5.…”
We treat utility maximization from terminal wealth for an agent with utility function U : R → R who dynamically invests in a continuous-time financial market and receives a possibly unbounded random endowment. We prove the existence of an optimal investment without introducing the associated dual problem. We rely on a recent result of Orlicz space theory, due to Delbaen and Owari which leads to a simple and transparent proof. Our results apply to non-smooth utilities and even strict concavity can be relaxed. We can handle certain random endowments with non-hedgeable risks, complementing earlier papers. Constraints on the terminal wealth can also be incorporated. As examples, we treat frictionless markets with finitely many assets and large financial markets. * The author thanks Freddy Delbaen and Keita Owari for discussions about Section 2 and an anonymous referee for very useful comments that led to substantial improvements. Special thanks go to Ngoc Huy Chau for discussions which helped discovering and removing an error.
“…In particular, to build the convex duality theory treating the problem with unhedgeable random endowment demands new techniques, especially if the endowment unbounded, see for example [4], [12], [19]. The references [18], [29], [23] and [27] also study this problem when the intermediate consumption is considered.…”
Abstract. This paper studies the utility maximization problem on the terminal wealth with both random endowments and proportional transaction costs. To deal with unbounded random payoffs from some illiquid claims, we propose to work with the acceptable portfolios defined via the consistent price system (CPS) such that the liquidation value processes stay above some stochastic thresholds. In the market consisting of one riskless bond and one risky asset, we obtain a type of the super-hedging result. Based on this characterization of the primal space, the existence and uniqueness of the optimal solution for the utility maximization problem are established using the convex duality analysis. As an important application of the duality theory, we provide some sufficient conditions for the existence of a shadow price process with random endowments in a generalized form similar to [5] as well as in the usual sense using acceptable portfolios.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.