2000
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1076-0342(2000)6:2(56)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Life-Cycle Costing with Partial Observability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A wide range of O&M processes can be modeled as a Markov process in continuous time, by selecting an appropriate set of state variables (e.g., these variables describe the complex evolution of damage patterns in structural systems) . This process can be converted into an approximate POMDP, by discretizing the time and domain of possible states and by defining costs, available actions, and corresponding transitions . In turn, the POMDP can be solved by implementing an appropriate numerical scheme to identify the optimal control policy.…”
Section: Continuous and Discrete Modeling Of The Maintenance Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A wide range of O&M processes can be modeled as a Markov process in continuous time, by selecting an appropriate set of state variables (e.g., these variables describe the complex evolution of damage patterns in structural systems) . This process can be converted into an approximate POMDP, by discretizing the time and domain of possible states and by defining costs, available actions, and corresponding transitions . In turn, the POMDP can be solved by implementing an appropriate numerical scheme to identify the optimal control policy.…”
Section: Continuous and Discrete Modeling Of The Maintenance Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Predictions on repair demands of the infrastructure in the future also have to be made along with appropriate budget plans that cover maintenance and repair requirements. Estimations of both life cycle cost and repair demands are usually determined by deterioration models (Guignier and Madanat, 1999;Jiang et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The probabilistic-based design optimization methodologies can be classified in the following formulations: robust design optimization (RDO) (Anthony and Keane, 2003;Beyer and Sendhoff, 2007;Doltsinis et al, 2005;Lagaros and Papadrakakis, 2007;McAllister and Simpson, 2003;Park et al, 2006;Parkinson et al, 2007;Rangavajhala et al, 2007;Ray and Smith, 2006;Schumacher and Olschinka, 2008;Zang et al, 2005) and reliability-based design optimization (RBO) (Acar and Haftka, 2007;Agarwal and Renaud, 2004;Du et al, 2006;Frangopol and Maute, 2003;Gunawan and Papalambros, 2006;Jensen et al, 2008;Jiang et al, 2000;Lagaros et al, 2008;Liang et al, 2007;Moses, 1997;Nikolaidis, 2007;Pu et al, 1997;Rackwitz, 2004;Repalle and Grandhi, 2005;Royset et al, 2001;Sørensen and TarpJohansen, 2005;Streicher and Rackwitz, 2004;Taflanidis and Beck, 2008). RDO methods primarily seek to minimize the influence of random variations of the nominal structural dimensions, material parameters and loading on the response of the structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%