“…An everlasting interest in the least squares method is well reflected by a immutable stream of articles, in which the method is utilized and most often plays a relevant role. Regarding recent research within broadly understood physics, exemplary applications of the method can be encountered in the following articles: Chou et al (2018) proposing a framework for privacy preserving compressive analysis (which exploits formulae for the Moore-Penrose inverse of columnwise partitioned matrices), Gaylord and Kilby (2004) specifying a procedure of measuring optical transmittance of photonic crystals, Huang et al (2006) introducing the extreme learning machine algorithm, Le Bigot et al (2008) presenting high-precision energy level calculations in atomic hydrogen and deuterium, Ordones et al (2019) deriving frequency transfer function formalism for phase-shifting algorithms, Sahoo and Ganguly (2015) optimizing the linear Glauber model to analyse kinetic properties of an arbitrary Ising system, Stanimirović et al (2013) introducing a computational method of the digital image restoration, Wang et al (1993) identifying sources of neuronal activity within the brain from measurements of the extracranial magnetic field, Wang and Zhang (2012) deriving an online linear discriminant analysis algorithm (which exploits formulae for the Moore-Penrose inverse of modified matrices), and White et al (2014) elaborating a method for computing the initial post-buckling response of variable-stiffness cylindrical panels (even though the least squares method was not explicitly mentioned in the paper, we conclude it was exploited from remarks on pp. 141 and 143 stating that the systems of equations solved were overdetermined).…”