2013
DOI: 10.5120/12096-8258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Load Factor for Approximate Nearest Neighbor Search under Exact Euclidean Locality Sensitive Hashing

Abstract: Locality Sensitive Hashing (LSH) is an index-based data structure that allows spatial item retrieval over a large dataset. The performance measure, ρ, has significant effect on the computational complexity and memory space requirement to create and store items in this data structure respectively. The minimization of ρ at a specific approximation factor c, is dependent on the load factor, α. Over the years, = 4has been used by researchers. In this paper, we demonstratethat the choice of = 4does not guarantee lo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…amplification gap), which is obtained by selecting α that minimizes this ratio at a specific c. An approximate solution is given as ρ(c) ≈ 1/c by [20] α = 4. However, we show that α = 5 gives a better optimal value for ρ than that of α = 4 [37].…”
Section: S-stable Distributionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…amplification gap), which is obtained by selecting α that minimizes this ratio at a specific c. An approximate solution is given as ρ(c) ≈ 1/c by [20] α = 4. However, we show that α = 5 gives a better optimal value for ρ than that of α = 4 [37].…”
Section: S-stable Distributionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…On one hand, the ENN is generally determined by a predefined constant or a spherical space with a specific radius. The reasonable neighborhood range is crucial for accurate and reliable normal vector estimation, especially when dealing with LSSPC [11]. On the other hand, these ENN-based algorithms are perhaps reasonable in the distance but are not reasonable in spatial distribution [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%