2017
DOI: 10.1109/tits.2016.2638898
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Load Scheduling of Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles via Weight-Aggregation Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 179 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since 2005 [51], it has been successfully used to handle many complicated optimization problems [52][53][54][55][56][57][58]. It has been compared with differential evolution (DE) [59,60], GA [25,53,61], particle swarm optimization (PSO) [62,63] and evolutionary algorithm (EA) [64] for multi-dimensional numeric problems. Its performance is better than or similar to these algorithms.…”
Section: Improved Artificial Bee Colony Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since 2005 [51], it has been successfully used to handle many complicated optimization problems [52][53][54][55][56][57][58]. It has been compared with differential evolution (DE) [59,60], GA [25,53,61], particle swarm optimization (PSO) [62,63] and evolutionary algorithm (EA) [64] for multi-dimensional numeric problems. Its performance is better than or similar to these algorithms.…”
Section: Improved Artificial Bee Colony Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the optimal controller developed in [11] will not necessarily lead to a stable system. The authors of [12] formulate the load scheduling of PHEVs as a multi-objective constrained optimization problem with the stability of the power system considered, and a weight aggregation multi-objective particle swarm optimization (WA-MOPSO) is presented to reach the optimal solution in a smart grid scenario. However, the algorithm they propose requires each vehicle to report its local information, such as battery levels and exit times, to a central optimal controller, so its implementation requires high computation capability and may not be feasible in a large-scale network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [13], the adjustable direct current OPF is presented and the objective function is taken as the total generation cost of units. And at the same time, the power flow characteristics of a modern power system are becoming increasingly complex due to the growing penetration of distributed generations [14][15][16][17] and the deployments of novel power electronic loads [18][19][20][21][22]. In this context, multi-objective OPF (MOPF) has received the extensive attention of researchers in the field of OPF [23][24][25][26][27][28], since it can coordinate different-weight or even conflicting multiple objectives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%