2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-96744-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal loading dose of meropenem before continuous infusion in critically ill patients: a simulation study

Abstract: The aim of this study was to investigate optimal loading doses prior to continuous infusion of meropenem in critically ill patients. A previously published and successfully evaluated pharmacokinetic model of critically ill patients was used for stochastic simulations of virtual patients. Maintenance doses administered as continuous infusion of 1.5–6 g/24 h with preceding loading doses (administered as 30 min infusion) of 0.15–2 g were investigated. In addition to the examination of the influence of individual … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Liebchen et al [ 55 ] reported on the optimal loading dose of meropenem before continuous infusion in critically ill patients using a previously evaluated pharmacokinetic model of critically ill patients. Maintenance doses administered as continuous infusion of 1.5–6 g/24 h with preceding loading doses (administered in 30 minutes) of 0.15–2 g were investigated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Liebchen et al [ 55 ] reported on the optimal loading dose of meropenem before continuous infusion in critically ill patients using a previously evaluated pharmacokinetic model of critically ill patients. Maintenance doses administered as continuous infusion of 1.5–6 g/24 h with preceding loading doses (administered in 30 minutes) of 0.15–2 g were investigated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If all 3 covariates showed extreme values (“worst-case scenario”), a loading dose of 0.5 g was necessary to achieve PK-PD targets. Liebchen et al [ 55 ] recommended the administration of a loading dose of 0.5 g meropenem over 30 minutes immediately followed by continuous infusion. It is interesting to note that a higher loading dose did not lead to further improvements of target attainment (%fT > MIC) [ 55 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing the load dose, extending the infusion time or providing continuous infusion (CI) of BLs can improve PK/PD parameters and the treatment success rate. 22 , 23 , 24 There are few studies on the PK/PD compliance status of CAZ‐AVI in critically ill patients and the optimization of treatment plans. The largest published clinical study to date included multidrug‐resistant (MDR)‐infected patients ( n = 31) receiving CI CAZ‐AVI to investigate the rate of joint PK/PD target achievement and the clinical efficacy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While 3–6 g meropenem per day administered by II is commonly used to achieve 100% fT > MIC of the 4–8 mg/L meropenem, a CI regimen would require only a bolus of 0.5 g meropenem followed by 0.5–1 g meropenem per day. 99,100 Therefore, the CI could cost 4 times less, when considering only the amount of meropenem used per day.…”
Section: Meropenemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are concerns regarding extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and PK-PD parameter modifications that are made due to meropenem degradation. 100,101 Nevertheless, several studies have examined ECMO as a factor related to target attainment. 94,102,103 Supporting the higher VD and CL of meropenem while on ECMO, studies demonstrated that for a typical PD target such as 100% fT > MIC, at least 6 g per day would be needed in patients with renal clearance up to 90 mL/min, compared with an MIC of 2 mg/L.…”
Section: Meropenemmentioning
confidence: 99%