2017
DOI: 10.1080/09715010.2017.1400410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal location and scheduling of booster chlorination stations using EPANET and PSO for drinking water distribution system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…subject to 0.2 ≤ cl t n ≤ 1.0 (10) where Nnode represents the number of nodes in the network, cl t n denotes the residual chlorine concentration at node n at time t, and cl * denotes the target chlorine concentration (0.2 mg/L). A smaller MAPE value indicates a more uniform chlorine distribution within the WDN, with zero being the ideal value.…”
Section: Chlorine Injection Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…subject to 0.2 ≤ cl t n ≤ 1.0 (10) where Nnode represents the number of nodes in the network, cl t n denotes the residual chlorine concentration at node n at time t, and cl * denotes the target chlorine concentration (0.2 mg/L). A smaller MAPE value indicates a more uniform chlorine distribution within the WDN, with zero being the ideal value.…”
Section: Chlorine Injection Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have optimized chlorine injection in WDNs, primarily focusing on booster chlorination [5,6]. These studies examined various aspects, such as optimizing booster injection schedules [4,[7][8][9][10] and booster location [5]. Some studies explored combinations of booster scheduling and location [11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%