2018
DOI: 10.1080/21563306.2018.12002410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Location and Sizing of Distributed Generation Unit Using Human Opinion Dynamics Optimization Technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An improved teaching learning based optimization algorithm [19] is utilised to determine the best placement and size of single and multiple wind turbine generation units while taking into account the objectives of loss minimization, increasing voltage profile, voltage stability, and line load-ability margin. A multiobjective stated problem is considered using a human opinion dynamics optimization approach by optimising voltage profile and lowering total losses through the best allocation of DGs in the distribution network discussed in [20]. The best placement of DGs is determined using a matrix-based radial distribution load flow method, and the best placement of EV loads is determined using a heuristic intelligent search method called Reptile Search Algorithm (RSA) [21].…”
Section: Nomenclature δ Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An improved teaching learning based optimization algorithm [19] is utilised to determine the best placement and size of single and multiple wind turbine generation units while taking into account the objectives of loss minimization, increasing voltage profile, voltage stability, and line load-ability margin. A multiobjective stated problem is considered using a human opinion dynamics optimization approach by optimising voltage profile and lowering total losses through the best allocation of DGs in the distribution network discussed in [20]. The best placement of DGs is determined using a matrix-based radial distribution load flow method, and the best placement of EV loads is determined using a heuristic intelligent search method called Reptile Search Algorithm (RSA) [21].…”
Section: Nomenclature δ Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO) in [18] could reach power loss reduction and increase purchasing power. In [19], human opinion dynamics (HOD) has successfully dealt with the IEEE 14-bus and 30-bus distribution systems.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different values have been set to weight factors of the three objectives, and the three objectives from BBO could not be better than those from other compared methods. In general, studies from [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] have tried to reduce power loss and operation cost and improve voltage, but they have ignored one important 2 Complexity factor, harmonic distortions. Two components to evaluate harmonics, THD and IHD, have not been considered as constraints or objective functions in the studies.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%