2024
DOI: 10.24084/repqj08.484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal location of a biomass power plant in the province of Granada analyzed by multi-criteria evaluation using appropriate Geographic Information System according to the Analytic Hierarchy Process

Abstract: Nowadays renewable energies are in a period of growth, which favours the birth of numerous researches like, for example, this study about the analysis of the optimal location of a biomass power plant in the province of Granada (Spain). So, the study will be developed using Geographic Information System (GIS) and Multi-Criteria Evaluation (MCE) according to the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). And the main target will be to determine the welcome capacity of the territory to this type of plants.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Viana et al [46], GIS data has been utilized to analyze, map, regulate, and classify the optimal biomass power facility location by gathering the radius area of thirteen new forest biomass power facilities in Portugal. Herrea-Seara et al [47] utilized a MCDA, as well as AHP and GIS techniques, to choose the optimal biomass power facility location in Granada province in Spain, and a comparable approach was projected in Valencia province by Prepina et al [48]. The Valencia province case of Spain has also been addressed with different approaches and methodologies to associate GIS methods on mathematical programming in order to optimize the location and size of a biomass power facility [49], as was a similar case in Italy by Freppaz et al [50].…”
Section: Study Discussion Comparisons and Limiationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Viana et al [46], GIS data has been utilized to analyze, map, regulate, and classify the optimal biomass power facility location by gathering the radius area of thirteen new forest biomass power facilities in Portugal. Herrea-Seara et al [47] utilized a MCDA, as well as AHP and GIS techniques, to choose the optimal biomass power facility location in Granada province in Spain, and a comparable approach was projected in Valencia province by Prepina et al [48]. The Valencia province case of Spain has also been addressed with different approaches and methodologies to associate GIS methods on mathematical programming in order to optimize the location and size of a biomass power facility [49], as was a similar case in Italy by Freppaz et al [50].…”
Section: Study Discussion Comparisons and Limiationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This and the critical requirements outlined by the regional or national levels, limit the potential location of biomass energy plants. Given that energy plants are inexistent in Tasmania, constraints and restriction factors were established from a prefeasibility study conducted by Dorset [34] and from previous published articles [12,23,[35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. Several constraints, both geological and environmental, were considered to select the potential location of biomass plants.…”
Section: Land Availability Analysis Using a Restriction Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, with the combination of Multicriteria Decision Analysis (MCDA), decision-makers can distinguish the present state of matters and some notion of future settings in energy management [12][13][14]. According to Herrea-Seara et al [15], MCDA was used to select the optimal biomass power facility location and the method of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and GIS as well in Granada province of Spain as a similar approach proposed in Valencia province (Spain) by Prepina et al [16]. In Valencia province, it has been also made with different methodologies to combine GIS techniques and methods [7] on mathematical programming to optimize the location and size of a biomass facility [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%