2022
DOI: 10.3390/e24081169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Maneuvering for Autonomous Vehicle Self-Localization

Abstract: We consider the problem of optimal maneuvering, where an autonomous vehicle, an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) for example, must maneuver to maximize or minimize an objective function. We consider a vehicle navigating in a Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS)-denied environment that self-localizes in two dimensions using angle-of-arrival (AOA) measurements from stationary beacons at known locations. The objective of the vehicle is to travel along the path that minimizes its position and heading estimation … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(116 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As our ultimate objective is to optimize the target tracking performance by means of appropriate UAV manoeuvres, the 4 × 4 submatrix of the BCRLB, Σ 11,k , will be the focus of attention. This is different from previous work, where the entire Σ k was used [16,21]. In (33), the contributions of the target AOA and beacon bearing measurements (I k and J k , respectively) to the recursive BFIM are influenced by several factors, the most obvious of which are the angle noise variances σ 2 θ and σ 2 θ i…”
Section: Estimation Bound For the Ekfmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As our ultimate objective is to optimize the target tracking performance by means of appropriate UAV manoeuvres, the 4 × 4 submatrix of the BCRLB, Σ 11,k , will be the focus of attention. This is different from previous work, where the entire Σ k was used [16,21]. In (33), the contributions of the target AOA and beacon bearing measurements (I k and J k , respectively) to the recursive BFIM are influenced by several factors, the most obvious of which are the angle noise variances σ 2 θ and σ 2 θ i…”
Section: Estimation Bound For the Ekfmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In addition to the algorithms developed in this paper, two modifications of the A-and D-optimality-based algorithms are also simulated to illustrate the effects of using the full Kalman filter covariance matrix rather than restricting the optimization problem to the target location covariance. Full Kalman filter covariances were used in [16,21]. In Figures 11 and 12, the modified A-optimality algorithm that minimizes the trace of the filtered state estimate covariance for all state variables (UAV and target kinematic parameters, as well as UAV orientation) is labelled "min tr P k|k ", and the modified D-optimality algorithm that maximizes the determinant of the inverse covariance matrix for all state variables is labelled "max |P −1 k|k |".…”
Section: Simulation Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation