2015
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.91.042338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal measurements for the discrimination of quantum states with a fixed rate of inconclusive results

Abstract: We study the discrimination of N mixed quantum states in an optimal measurement that maximizes the probabihty of correct results while the probability of inconclusive results is fixed at a given value. After considering the discrimination of N states in a d -dimensional Hilbert space, we focus on the discrimination of qubit states. We develop a method to determine an optimal measurement for discriminating arbitrary qubit states, taking into account that often the optimal measurement is not unique and the maxim… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus if we define our z-axis to be such that the z-component of p j ρ j is the same for each of the three signal states identified, then Γ also has the same z-component, and the optimal measurement operators lie in the equatorial plane. Note that a similar discussion may be found in [26].…”
Section: Qubit State Discriminationsupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus if we define our z-axis to be such that the z-component of p j ρ j is the same for each of the three signal states identified, then Γ also has the same z-component, and the optimal measurement operators lie in the equatorial plane. Note that a similar discussion may be found in [26].…”
Section: Qubit State Discriminationsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…The study of quantum state discrimination has a long history, beginning with the pioneering work of Helstrom, Holevo, and others in the 1960s and 1970s [7,8], who sought to understand the fundamental limits imposed by quantum theory on optical communications. Since then there has been much fur- * g.weir.2@research.gla.ac.uk ther development, with the construction of strategies based on various figures of merit [4][5][6][7][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25], as well as ones that interpolate between these [26,27]. We are interested here in the minimum error strategy, based on perhaps the most natural figure of merit: what is the highest possible probability of correctly identifying the state?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By writing Γ −1 in the form 1 2 (a1 + b ·σ), we find three linear equations in three unknowns. As described in [27] and [37], we may assume from symmetry that the optimal POVM will be in the same plane as the states, so b z = 0, and hence find a, b x , b y . Thus we can find Γ and hence P Corr , the optimal probability of correctly identifying the state which was sent, as P Corr = k p k Tr(ρ k π k ) = Tr(Γ) = 4a a 2 −|b| 2 .…”
Section: Optimal Three-element Povmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact q (0) 0 and q (1) 0 are the key to solve FRIR of two qubit states. In fact, Nakahira et al [37] and Herzog [38] could not give a solution to the FRIR of two mixed qubit states. In this paper we provide a solution to the FRIR of two mixed qubit states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%