2020
DOI: 10.1137/18m122159x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Mesh Size for Inverse Medium Scattering Problems

Abstract: An optimal mesh size of the sampling region can help to reduce computational burden in practical applications. In this work, we investigate optimal choices of mesh sizes for the identifications of medium obstacles from either the far-field or near-field data in two and three dimensions. The results would have applications in the reconstruction process of inverse scattering problems. MSC classification.: 35R30, 45Q05, 65R32.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have also checked that the method is very robust in connection with this issue. For a discussion about the selection of optimal meshes for the evaluation of indicator functions, we refer to [41]. These results provide the initial stage to implement iterative corrections, as we explain in Section 5.…”
Section: Multifrequency Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have also checked that the method is very robust in connection with this issue. For a discussion about the selection of optimal meshes for the evaluation of indicator functions, we refer to [41]. These results provide the initial stage to implement iterative corrections, as we explain in Section 5.…”
Section: Multifrequency Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We fixed M 5 100 for 2D simulations and M 5 40 for the 3D ones since these values provide clear visualizations. For the selection of optimal meshes for evaluating indicator functions, we refer to Ammari et al (2020).…”
Section: Implementation Of the Iterative Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the selection of suitable meshes for the evaluation of indicator functions is not a trivial step, specially when data correspond to different frequencies. For details on this topic we refer to [2]. However, we checked that for the multifrequency data available in the Fresnel databases our method is robust in connection with the mesh selection and only a slight calibration was needed.…”
Section: Topological Sensitivity Based Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, as already mentioned, the definition of the approximated domain Ω app,λ depends on the selected grid. In principle, suitable grids depend on the frequency (see [2]). However, we have checked that for the multifrequency measurements available in the Fresnel databases our method is very robust in connection with the mesh selection.…”
Section: Target Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%