2010
DOI: 10.1049/iet-spr.2009.0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal minimum variance estimation for non-linear discrete-time multichannel systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simple solution that follows arises because Downloaded by [University of Chicago Library] at 08:14 20 November 2014 of the assumptions of linearity for the signal-generating model and the results obtained here involve only a leastsquares type of analysis (Grimble & Shamsher, 2010).…”
Section: Nmve-based Fault Detectionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The simple solution that follows arises because Downloaded by [University of Chicago Library] at 08:14 20 November 2014 of the assumptions of linearity for the signal-generating model and the results obtained here involve only a leastsquares type of analysis (Grimble & Shamsher, 2010).…”
Section: Nmve-based Fault Detectionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In nonlinear minimum-variance estimation, the nonlinearities are assumed to be in the signal channel or possibly in a noise channel representing the uncertainty. The simple solution that follows arises because of the assumptions of linearity for the signal generating model and the results obtained here involve only a least-squares type of analysis [19].…”
Section: Nmve Based Fault Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In NMVE, the non-linearities are assumed to be in the signal channel or possibly in a noise channel representing the uncertainty. The simple solution that follows arises because of the assumptions of linearity for the signal generating model and the results obtained here involve only a least-squares type of analysis (Grimble and Shamsher, 2010). The FD techniques are often based on the generation of appropriate residual signals, which have to be sensitive to faults themselves but independent of disturbances.…”
Section: Nmve-based Fault Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classic work of Rao and Whyte [1] presented such approach using decentralised Kalman filtering to accomplish globally optimal performance in the case where all sensors can communicate with all other sensors. Other published methods can be a sensor‐less approach [2, 3] or a derivative‐free filtering estimation [4], a least‐squares‐Kalman technique [5], a robot‐based autonomous estimation and detection [6], H ∞ filtering‐based estimation made for stochastic incomplete measurements [7], sequential Bayesian learning‐based dual estimation method [8], process noise identification‐based particle filter estimation [9], a non‐linear operator‐based estimation [10, 11], quantised measurements‐based state estimation [12], forward backward (FB)‐Kalman filter (KF)‐based estimation in fault diagnosis scheme [13], state estimation for static networks using weighted filters [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%