2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2017.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal motivation in Peruvian high schools: Should learners pursue and teachers promote mastery goals, performance-approach goals or both?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
2
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
26
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…When analyzing the scores obtained in the motivational climate, it is verified that the schoolchildren obtain higher values in the task climate and its three dimensions, in comparison to the Climate Ego, data that coincide with the conclusion of investigations carried out by González-Cutre, Sicilia and Moreno [50], Almagro, Sáenz-López and Moreno-Murcia [20], Martínez, Cervello and Moreno [51]. This may be due to the fact that students orient their actions towards effort, persistence and personal improvement as well as valuing teamwork [52]. On the other hand, the averages referring to the ego climate and its dimensions were lower for the categories of UR and PE in González-Valero's study [53].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…When analyzing the scores obtained in the motivational climate, it is verified that the schoolchildren obtain higher values in the task climate and its three dimensions, in comparison to the Climate Ego, data that coincide with the conclusion of investigations carried out by González-Cutre, Sicilia and Moreno [50], Almagro, Sáenz-López and Moreno-Murcia [20], Martínez, Cervello and Moreno [51]. This may be due to the fact that students orient their actions towards effort, persistence and personal improvement as well as valuing teamwork [52]. On the other hand, the averages referring to the ego climate and its dimensions were lower for the categories of UR and PE in González-Valero's study [53].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Specifically, MGSs are positively associated with intrinsic motivation and academic self-concept (Murayama & Elliot, 2009), self-efficacy (Roeser, Midgley, & Urdan, 1996), use of effective learning strategies such as self-regulated learning (Wolters, 2004), deep level learning strategies (Michou et al, 2013;Miki & Yamauchi, 2005) and the experience of flow (Harwood, Keegan, Smith, & Raine, 2015). PGSs, on the other hand, are negatively related to intrinsic motivation (Meece et al, 2006), positively associated with surface level learning (Miki & Yamauchi, 2005), and self-handicapping strategies (Urdan & Midgley, 2001) or unrelated to learning strategies and achievement (Matos, Lens, Vansteenkiste, & Mouratidis, 2017). Few studies have also investigated the effects of multiple goal structures (i.e., focus on both MGSs and PGSs) on optimal educational experience.…”
Section: Classroom Goal Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fifty-eight of the 63 studies in this category refer to one, or several, of the seminal studies of deep learning from the 1970s and 1980s when defining deep learning-e.g., Marton and Säljö (1976a), Biggs (1987Biggs ( , 1993 or Entwistle and Ramsden (1983)-clearly highlighting a connection with the conceptual framework of Student Approaches to Learning (SAL). Five of the studies included in this category do not refer to any of these publications, but they use the terms deep learning (Liem, Ginns, Martin, Stone, & Herrett, 2012; van Aalst, Hing, May, & Yan, 2007), deep-level learning strategies (Matos et al, 2017), deep processing strategies (Chou, 2017) and deep cognitive learning strategies (Şen, 2016). However, the main elements in the definitions in these five publications are clearly similar to the definitions of the 58 other publications in this category.…”
Section: Deep Learning As Meaningful Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%