2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2017.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal number and location of storage hubs and biogas production reactors in farmlands with allocation of multiple feedstocks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sarker et 10.11113/mjfas.v20n2.3085 al. [9] and [10] solved a location-allocation problem of the bio-methane gas supply chain constituted by multiple residues, hubs, and reactors. Saadati and Hosseininezhad [11] designed a bagasse-based bioethanol supply chain for locating hubs by considering road and rail transport.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sarker et 10.11113/mjfas.v20n2.3085 al. [9] and [10] solved a location-allocation problem of the bio-methane gas supply chain constituted by multiple residues, hubs, and reactors. Saadati and Hosseininezhad [11] designed a bagasse-based bioethanol supply chain for locating hubs by considering road and rail transport.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the critical aims in the context of the biogas subject is where to establish the biogas production sites and charging stations. A location problem of biogas reactors was studied in a work [6]. They proposed a mixed-integer nonlinear problem for a biogas supply chain system.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kumar et al reported that adaptive large neighborhood search (ALNS), a heuristic algorithm, took 140 s while CPLEX took ~3 h to find the solution for the same BSC problem (Kumar et al, 2015). A few studies showed a longer computational time comparing heuristic‐based optimization (that does not have a commercial solver) with commercial solvers such as LINGO (Sarker et al, 2018, 2019; Wu et al, 2015). However, compared with open‐source mixed‐integer non‐linear programming (MINLP) solvers, BONMIN and NOMAD, heuristics can achieve better values for the objective functions (Sarker et al, 2018, 2019; Wu et al, 2015).…”
Section: Applications Of Artificial Intelligence To Bioenergy Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few studies showed a longer computational time comparing heuristic‐based optimization (that does not have a commercial solver) with commercial solvers such as LINGO (Sarker et al, 2018, 2019; Wu et al, 2015). However, compared with open‐source mixed‐integer non‐linear programming (MINLP) solvers, BONMIN and NOMAD, heuristics can achieve better values for the objective functions (Sarker et al, 2018, 2019; Wu et al, 2015). However, all three studies were conducted by the same authors and this advantage of heuristics was reported for similar biogas systems.…”
Section: Applications Of Artificial Intelligence To Bioenergy Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%