2005
DOI: 10.1137/s0097539705446895
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Online Algorithms for Multidimensional Packing Problems

Abstract: We solve an open problem in the literature by providing an online algorithm for multidimensional bin packing that uses only bounded space. To achieve this, we introduce a new technique for classifying the items to be packed. We show that our algorithm is optimal among bounded space algorithms for any dimension d > 1. Its asymptotic performance ratio is (Π ∞) d , where Π ∞ ≈ 1.691 is the asymptotic performance ratio of the one-dimensional algorithm Harmonic. A modified version of this algorithm for the case whe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
81
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For bounded space algorithms, a lower bound of (Π ∞ ) d is implied by [5]. A matching upper bound was shown in [7]. This was done by giving an extension of HARMONIC which uses only bounded space.…”
Section: Previous Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For bounded space algorithms, a lower bound of (Π ∞ ) d is implied by [5]. A matching upper bound was shown in [7]. This was done by giving an extension of HARMONIC which uses only bounded space.…”
Section: Previous Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the variable-sized packing, the method used in this paper generalizes and combines the methods used in [7] and [14]. The are some new ingredients that we use in this paper.…”
Section: Previous Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Csirik and Johnson (2001) presented an 1.7-competitive algorithm (K-Bounded Best Fit algorithms (BBF K )) for one dimensional bin packing using K active bins, where K ≥ 2. For multi-dimensional case, Epstein and van Stee (2005b) Chin et al (2012) proposed an 8.84-competitive packing strategy, then they further improved the upper bound to 5.155 (Zhang et al 2010), they also gave the lower bound 3 for 1-space bounded two dimensional bin packing.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Epstein et al [8] gave a 1.69103 d -competitive algorithm using (2M − 1) d active bins, where M ≥ 10 is an integer such that M ≥ 1/(1 − (1 − ε) 1/(d+2) ) − 1, ε > 0 and d is the dimension of the bin packing problem. For the 1-space bounded variant, Fujita [12] gave an O((log log m) 2 )-competitive algorithm, where m is the width of the square bin and the size of each item is a × b, where a, b are integers no larger than m. He also proved that the competitive ratio for the 1-bounded space variant is at least 23/11.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%