2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0005-1098(02)00240-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal output-transitions for linear systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to d (t), when t → −∞ in the delimiting situation [16], the input Eq. (39) and the antistable subsystem equation in (40) are changed as…”
Section: Pre-action Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to d (t), when t → −∞ in the delimiting situation [16], the input Eq. (39) and the antistable subsystem equation in (40) are changed as…”
Section: Pre-action Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Delimiting state. The delimiting state [21] is defined as the system state x = [ ] ⊤ satisfyingẋ = Ax = 0 as time t tends to infinity.…”
Section: Pre-actuationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is easy to see that E(y(k)) is given by the r.h.s. of (11) and E(e t (k)) is given by the r.h.s. of (12) wherẽ z(k) is obtained replacing x(0) with x 0 .…”
Section: The Stochastic Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, many methods are based on the model stable inversion [3][4][5], which allows exact tracking through an infinite preactuation interval. The practical infeasibility of this solution motivated the use of approximated preview-based inversion techniques with preactuation [6][7][8][9][10][11]. All the above papers assume that the system is hyperbolic, namely without zeros on the boundary of the stability region (the imaginary axis or the unitary Manuscript received February 28, 2014; revised July 21, 2014; accepted October 10, 2014.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%