2017 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Networks and Telecommunications Systems (ANTS) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/ants.2017.8384088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal placement of colocated and non-colocated LWA nodes in dense deployments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a separate study, [11] addressed the challenge of colocated and non-colocated node placement in Long Term Evolution (LTE)-WiFi aggregation networks. They formulated this problem as a Mixed Integer Nonlinear Programming (MINLP) problem.…”
Section: B Placement In Wifi and Heterogeneous Rf Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a separate study, [11] addressed the challenge of colocated and non-colocated node placement in Long Term Evolution (LTE)-WiFi aggregation networks. They formulated this problem as a Mixed Integer Nonlinear Programming (MINLP) problem.…”
Section: B Placement In Wifi and Heterogeneous Rf Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of UEs are uniformly distributed in the hotspot area. Moreover, the indoor WLAN path loss model is represented as follows [32] P W Loss = 20 log 10 f w (MHz)+η w log 10 d + P f (n w )−28 (24) where f w represents the WLAN transmission frequency; d is the distance in meters between WAP and UE; η w is the distance power loss coefficient and assumed to be 30; P f (n w ) denotes the penetration loss factor and is equal to P f (n w ) = n w + 13; n w is the number of walls and assumed to be 3. While the indoor Path loss model for LTE Femto SBS is expressed as follows [33]…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%