1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0141-0296(96)00034-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal placement of energy dissipation devices for three-dimensional structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
37
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The design aspect of structures equipped with passive devices has been considered by many researchers [19][20][21]. Nakashima et al [21] described that the first yielding, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The design aspect of structures equipped with passive devices has been considered by many researchers [19][20][21]. Nakashima et al [21] described that the first yielding, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over many years, research efforts have been aimed at reliable and cost-effective design practices. Optimal design methodologies for passive dampers based on a number of theories have been proposed for determining both damper sizes as in [7][8][9][10][11] and damper locations as in [12][13][14][15] among others. They commonly differ on how the optimisation problem is addressed and in which cost function and constraints the optimisation problem are subjected to.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Takewaki (1997) [14] used a gradient-based approach to search for an optimal placement. Teng et al (1992) [15] and Xu et al (2002) [16] developed an incremental algorithm and Wu et al (1997) [17] used both iterative and sequential approaches. Zhang et al (1992) [18] and Lopez et al (2002) [19] proposed sequential search methods for optimal damper placement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%