2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrmge.2021.01.007
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal placement of two soil soundings for rectangular footings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results provided by the algorithm, which use the constant covariance matrix concept, are very close to those obtained by the iterative procedure. This is very promising for further application of the algorithm 'C' in solving practical problems, e.g., optimal placement of soil soundings Chwała, 2021). It is also the most important result of the study that opens up the possibility of using the constant covariance matrix.…”
Section: Conclusion and Final Remarksmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results provided by the algorithm, which use the constant covariance matrix concept, are very close to those obtained by the iterative procedure. This is very promising for further application of the algorithm 'C' in solving practical problems, e.g., optimal placement of soil soundings Chwała, 2021). It is also the most important result of the study that opens up the possibility of using the constant covariance matrix.…”
Section: Conclusion and Final Remarksmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…As a numerical example, the proposed algorithm is used to analyse the threedimensional bearing capacity of a shallow foundation under undrained conditions and the bearing capacity of two-layered soils. The comparison of the iterative approach with the constant matrix approach is crucial for further practical applications of the simplified algorithm for three-dimensional issues like soil sounding location optimization 2021). This comparison is important due to the enormous reduction in computation time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%