2012 IEEE 51st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2012.6426189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal point estimates for multi-target states based on kernel distances

Abstract: Abstract-Almost all multi-target tracking systems have to generate point estimates for the targets, e.g., for displaying the tracks. The novel idea in this paper is to consider point estimates for multi-target states that are optimal according to a kernel distance measure. Because the kernel distance is a metric on point sets and ignores the target labels, shortcomings of Minimum Mean Squared Error (MMSE) estimates for multitarget states can be avoided. We show how the calculation of these point estimates can … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The third measure is cardinality error (CE), which quantifies the discrepancy between the number of targets and tracks. The fourth measure is the integrated squared distance (ISD), for which analytical expressions for sums of Gaussians are known [6,9]. The multi-target ground truth distribution is a sum of Dirac delta functions, so we increase target and track covariances by 2 / 2 .…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third measure is cardinality error (CE), which quantifies the discrepancy between the number of targets and tracks. The fourth measure is the integrated squared distance (ISD), for which analytical expressions for sums of Gaussians are known [6,9]. The multi-target ground truth distribution is a sum of Dirac delta functions, so we increase target and track covariances by 2 / 2 .…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon is particularly relevant in low I detection-probability settings, or in multi-sensor settings with disparate detection probabilities and revisit intervals. Our use of the MISD is motivated by related work [4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%