2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2014.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal portfolio with vector expected utility

Abstract: We study the optimal portfolio selected by an investor who conforms to Siniscalchi (2009)'s Vector Expected Utility's (VEU) axioms and who is ambiguity averse. To this end, we derive a mean-variance preference generalised to ambiguity from the second-order Taylor-Young expansion of the VEU certainty equivalent. We apply this Mean Variance Variability preference to the static two-assets portfolio problem and deduce asset allocation results which extend the mean-variance analysis to ambiguity in the VEU framewor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, we expect an ambiguity premium to arise, as is the case in standard ambiguity models accounting for the equity premium puzzle (see e.g., Chen and Epstein, 2002;Maenhout, 2004;Cao et al, 2005;Leippold et al, 2008;Ui, 2010;Ju and Miao, 2012), or the home equity bias (see e.g., Epstein and Miao, 2003;André 2014). This leads to our first conjecture.…”
Section: Conjecturesmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…That is, we expect an ambiguity premium to arise, as is the case in standard ambiguity models accounting for the equity premium puzzle (see e.g., Chen and Epstein, 2002;Maenhout, 2004;Cao et al, 2005;Leippold et al, 2008;Ui, 2010;Ju and Miao, 2012), or the home equity bias (see e.g., Epstein and Miao, 2003;André 2014). This leads to our first conjecture.…”
Section: Conjecturesmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The equity premium puzzle according to which stock returns are excessively high compared to bonds (Campbell and Cochrane, 1999) has been accounted for by the existence of an ambiguity premium on stocks which tends to depress prices and increase returns (see e.g., Chen and Epstein, 2002;Maenhout, 2004;Cao et al, 2005;Leippold et al, 2008;Ui, 2010;Ju and Miao, 2012). Using related arguments, several works have also relied on ambiguity aversion to account for the equity home bias by which traders under-invest in foreign assets (see e.g., Epstein and Miao, 2003;André 2014).…”
Section: Ambiguity In Financial Marketsmentioning
confidence: 99%