2005
DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2005.846070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Power Flow as a Tool for Fault Level-Constrained Network Capacity Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
57
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Constraints are basically categorized into equality and inequality which must be satisfied by the objective functions either single or multi-objectives. The common constraints generally in DG placement includes but not limited to the following; line thermal limit, short circuit ratio limit, voltage step limit, phase angle limit, power generation limit, DG power generation limit, number of DG limit, power flow equality constraint, voltage profile limits, short circuit level limit, total line loss limit, substation transformer capacity limit, tap position limit, and power factor limit [12,14,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. Distributed Generation Placement Many researchers proposed different methods such as analytic as well as deterministic and heuristic methods to solve placements problems.…”
Section: Dg Placement and Sizingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Constraints are basically categorized into equality and inequality which must be satisfied by the objective functions either single or multi-objectives. The common constraints generally in DG placement includes but not limited to the following; line thermal limit, short circuit ratio limit, voltage step limit, phase angle limit, power generation limit, DG power generation limit, number of DG limit, power flow equality constraint, voltage profile limits, short circuit level limit, total line loss limit, substation transformer capacity limit, tap position limit, and power factor limit [12,14,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. Distributed Generation Placement Many researchers proposed different methods such as analytic as well as deterministic and heuristic methods to solve placements problems.…”
Section: Dg Placement and Sizingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the OPF methods of [29] and [30] as extended by [8], the addition of a multi-year optimisation captures the planning process more realistically including the impact of investment timing as well as load growth. The computational burden is managed by the use of discrete load bands across each year (maximum, normal work hour, medium and mini-8 mum load, Fig.…”
Section: Modelling Dno Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Ref [3], the authors determined the siting and sizing, in addition to the technology portfolios of ESSs. Moreover, some researchers have studied the allocation of DGs considering the contingencies in power systems [4][5][6][7]. A new method for the allocation of new generation capacity was presented, focusing on the fault level in power systems in Ref [4], but it did not consider the allocation of ESSs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, some researchers have studied the allocation of DGs considering the contingencies in power systems [4][5][6][7]. A new method for the allocation of new generation capacity was presented, focusing on the fault level in power systems in Ref [4], but it did not consider the allocation of ESSs. In Ref [5], a problem was proposed to determine the allocation of DGs considering two factors: congestion of transmission lines and contingencies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%