2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2014.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal power flow solution of power system incorporating stochastic wind power using Gbest guided artificial bee colony algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
125
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
125
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The best solutions of other optimization methods previously mentioned are compared with the FCGCS approach and Table 6 presents the statistical results. It can be seen that the optimal result of FCGCS is better than those in [11,21,26]. However, the best solutions as given in [10,12] are better than our proposed FCGCS method, which are indeed infeasible solutions.…”
Section: Case 14 Voltage Stability Indexmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The best solutions of other optimization methods previously mentioned are compared with the FCGCS approach and Table 6 presents the statistical results. It can be seen that the optimal result of FCGCS is better than those in [11,21,26]. However, the best solutions as given in [10,12] are better than our proposed FCGCS method, which are indeed infeasible solutions.…”
Section: Case 14 Voltage Stability Indexmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…compared with Case 1.1. Furthermore, the comparison of system voltage profiles between Case 1.1 and Case 1.3 is presented in Figure 5, which [3] 0.093269 0.093952 0.094171 LTLBO [24] 0.0974 0.0983 0.1006 DE-PS [25] 0.0978 0.0997 0.1022 GABC [26] 0.1007 0.1052 0.1097 BBO [12] 0.1020 0.1105 0.1207 clearly shows the improvement of bus voltage profile. The simulation results of FCGCS and other methods summarized in Table 5 indicate the FCGCS method has powerful searching ability.…”
Section: Case 12 Active Power Lossesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2014, Panda and Tripathy [104] presented an OPF solution for modified power system in which three conventional generators are replaced by wind-energy conversion systems (WECS). To justify the limitation of reactive power generation capability of WECS, genetic algorithm (GA) and a modified bacteria [92][93][94][95][96][97][98][99][100][101][102][103][104][105][106] foraging algorithm are employed independently, for determining the optimal schedule. In 2015, Panda and Tripathy [105] presented a modified bacteria foraging algorithm, which is capable of handling multiobjective optimization problems.…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting risk measure formulates risk-based constraints for the postcontingency line flows. In 2015, Roy and Jadhav [106] presented an OPF study in view of probabilistic nature of wind power. The wind power intermittency is modelled by the parameters of Weibull probability function.…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the improvement of parameters is also considered in the proposed method. As to the problem of constraints, in many literatures, evolutionary algorithms choose the penalty function method to handle the inequality constraints of dependent variables [12,[22][23][24]. However, the method requires many penalty factors, and the setting and adjustment of these parameters may increase the complexity of the algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%