2010
DOI: 10.1016/s0252-9602(10)60078-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal proportional reinsurance with constant dividend barrier

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Others have concentrated on the way in which certain balance sheet items of insurers have been influenced by reporting or fiscal objectives (Gaver and Paterson, 2010) or by underestimation of technical provisions on the balance sheet (Petroni, 1992) or verifying the adequacy of reserves (liability adequacy test) (Giovando, 2006). Various observers have examined the relationship between a series of stochastic models used by insurers and the dividend distributed by these to their shareholders (Haili and Yijun, 2010;Lin et al, 2003;Taksar, 2000).…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others have concentrated on the way in which certain balance sheet items of insurers have been influenced by reporting or fiscal objectives (Gaver and Paterson, 2010) or by underestimation of technical provisions on the balance sheet (Petroni, 1992) or verifying the adequacy of reserves (liability adequacy test) (Giovando, 2006). Various observers have examined the relationship between a series of stochastic models used by insurers and the dividend distributed by these to their shareholders (Haili and Yijun, 2010;Lin et al, 2003;Taksar, 2000).…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the framework of Bai and Guo , Cao and Wan , Egami and Young , Eisenberg and Schmidli , Haili and Yijun , He and Liang , Hojgaard and Taksar , Luo et al , Markussen and Taksar , Promislow and Young , Schmidli , and Zeng , the claims process is hereafter assumed to be modeled by a Brownian motion with drift. As a result, the cumulative claims process C ( t ) may be modeled by a Brownian motion with drift of a similar type, that is, normaldC(t)MathClass-rel=anormaldtMathClass-bin−bnormaldB(t)MathClass-punc, where a and b are positive constants.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we are considering in this paper the problem of optimal investment of the reserves of the firm and of reinsurance of the total risk portfolio of the firm, this is an assumption that we may adopt without getting into any serious conceptual or modeling pitfalls. This assumption is commonly adopted in the literature (see, e.g., Bai and Guo , Cao and Wan , Egami and Young , Eisenberg and Schmidli , Haili and Yijun , He and Liang , Hojgaard and Taksar , Luo et al , Markussen and Taksar , Promislow and Young , Schmidli , Zeng , in which the Brownian motion with drift is used as a model for the claims process). Although this model is not an exact model for the claims process, its simplicity allows for closed‐form results that qualitatively capture the essence of the phenomena and rewards us for possible deviations in terms of quantitative results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%