2007 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing - ICASSP '07 2007
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2007.366760
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Quantization Schemes for Orthogonal Random Beamforming - A Cross-Layer Approach

Abstract: Orthogonal random beamforming (ORB) has recently attracted signi cant interest because of its ability to exploit multi-user diversity and spatial multiplexing gains by exclusively using partial channel state information (CSI). In this paper, we explore the impact of CSI quantization on the performance of ORB. By resorting to a dynamic programming formulation, we identify the optimal (i.e. pdfmatched) quantizer for which the sum-rate distortion is minimized. This is a cross-layer approach in the sense that the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [8], the threshold DRAFT is determined by the scheduling outage probability P out which is the probability that none of the users feeds back. In the performance comparison, we additionally introduce a slightly modified Scheme D based on the design philosophy proposed in this paper by setting the threshold as r th,N of Scheme C, such that the P out of this scheme equals to the probability of rate loss event P L of Scheme C in (17). Thus, in the comparison, we will consider Scheme D with constant P out = 10 −1 , 10 −4 , and…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [8], the threshold DRAFT is determined by the scheduling outage probability P out which is the probability that none of the users feeds back. In the performance comparison, we additionally introduce a slightly modified Scheme D based on the design philosophy proposed in this paper by setting the threshold as r th,N of Scheme C, such that the P out of this scheme equals to the probability of rate loss event P L of Scheme C in (17). Thus, in the comparison, we will consider Scheme D with constant P out = 10 −1 , 10 −4 , and…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%