2010
DOI: 10.1080/10485250903301517
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal ranked set sampling estimation based on medians from multiple set sizes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…. , m, from the population for the purpose of ranking and finally nominating m sampling units (one from each set) for sizes in random helps to apply the RNS scheme in circumstances where the set size might be random (see Boyles and Samaniego (1986) and Gemayel et al (2010)). Another advantage of allowing the set size to be random is that, when ρ 1 > 0, randomized nomination sample is expected to contain a simple random sample of size mρ 1 in addition to a collection of extremal order statistics from various set sizes, which contain more information about the underlying population than SRS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. , m, from the population for the purpose of ranking and finally nominating m sampling units (one from each set) for sizes in random helps to apply the RNS scheme in circumstances where the set size might be random (see Boyles and Samaniego (1986) and Gemayel et al (2010)). Another advantage of allowing the set size to be random is that, when ρ 1 > 0, randomized nomination sample is expected to contain a simple random sample of size mρ 1 in addition to a collection of extremal order statistics from various set sizes, which contain more information about the underlying population than SRS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One alternative in such situations is to pare down the larger sets to agree in size with the smaller sets, but that can lead to a loss of valuable information that could have been obtained from the more comprehensive rankings within the larger sets. Gemayel et al 75 propose an estimator for the median of a symmetric population that combines medians of ranked set samples of varying sizes. While not optimal for any specific symmetric distribution, they show that the estimator is robust over a wide class of symmetric distributions.…”
Section: Unequal Set Sizesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a design is unbalanced to the extreme. Beyond that, RSS procedures can be envisaged that involve multiple set sizes in a single application (Gemayel et al 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%