2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2009.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal reconstructed section thickness for the detection of liver lesions with multidetector CT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Soo et al8 found that a slice thickness of 5 mm allowed a better detection, by radiologists, of lesions <5 mm in diameter than 2.5, 7.5, and 10 mm slices. Z ‐axial PVE dramatically decreased the detection rate from 95% for 5 mm slices to 65% and 42% for the thicker 7.5‐ and 10‐mm slices, respectively, while an increase in image noise on the thinner 2.5‐mm slices decreased detection to 90%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Soo et al8 found that a slice thickness of 5 mm allowed a better detection, by radiologists, of lesions <5 mm in diameter than 2.5, 7.5, and 10 mm slices. Z ‐axial PVE dramatically decreased the detection rate from 95% for 5 mm slices to 65% and 42% for the thicker 7.5‐ and 10‐mm slices, respectively, while an increase in image noise on the thinner 2.5‐mm slices decreased detection to 90%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, tradeoffs between axial resolution and noise can be envisaged to optimize CT protocols for an envisaged clinical application 7. Previous studies have tested various protocols to find the slice thickness,8, 9, 10 slice spacing,11, 12 or interpolation algorithm13 that would give the best compromise between z ‐axial resolution and noise. Although the physical relationships between axial resolution and noise in CT are long known, the stochastic influence of z ‐axial PVE on the contrast of small objects has never been taken into account.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results showed that 5-mm slice thickness proved to be more effective in the detection of small liver metastases. Soo et al reported significantly improved sensitivity in 2.5-mm and 5-mm compared with 7.5-mm and 10-mm slices for the detection of liver lesions (92% in 2.5 mm, 98% in 5 mm, 78% in 7.5-mm, and 54% in 10-mm) [16]. They noticed an impaired diagnostic accuracy in 2.5-mm compared to 5-mm computed slices due to lower signal noise to ratio.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the analytical model may be easily applied for a complicated clinical task such as liver lesion detection. For example, Soo et al found that a slice thickness of 5 mm allowed a better detection, by radiologists, of lesions <5 mm in diameter than 2.5, 7.5, and 10 mm slices. Z ‐axial PVE dramatically decreased the detection rate from 95% for 5 mm slices to 65% and 42% for the thicker 7.5‐ and 10‐mm slices, respectively, while an increase in image noise on the thinner 2.5‐mm slices decreased detection to 90%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, tradeoffs between axial resolution and noise can be envisaged to optimize CT protocols for an envisaged clinical application . Previous studies have tested various protocols to find the slice thickness, slice spacing, or interpolation algorithm that would give the best compromise between z ‐axial resolution and noise. Although the physical relationships between axial resolution and noise in CT are long known, the stochastic influence of z ‐axial PVE on the contrast of small objects has never been taken into account.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%