2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2015.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal relativities and transition rules of a bonus–malus system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The BMS system typically constitutes three elements: the Bonus-Malus (BM) levels, transition rules to navigate the BM levels, and the relativity attached to each BM level. In the classical BMS, the transition rule is governed by frequency; it ignores the severity information, which implies that the future loss of a policyholder can be appropriately modeled by predicting the frequency only (see, e.g., Lemaire (2012); Denuit et al (2007); Tan et al (2015). In reality, this frequency-driven BMS transition rule is the standard practice in many jurisdictions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The BMS system typically constitutes three elements: the Bonus-Malus (BM) levels, transition rules to navigate the BM levels, and the relativity attached to each BM level. In the classical BMS, the transition rule is governed by frequency; it ignores the severity information, which implies that the future loss of a policyholder can be appropriately modeled by predicting the frequency only (see, e.g., Lemaire (2012); Denuit et al (2007); Tan et al (2015). In reality, this frequency-driven BMS transition rule is the standard practice in many jurisdictions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there exist many variations of this type of models [21], [22], [23], most of them can be modeled by means of discrete-time Markov chains [24]. The model behind the simulator is a simple version that contains the main features of a BMS.…”
Section: A the Bms Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given these two inputs, the optimal relativities are determined and applied to all drivers independent of their a priori risk characteristics. To partially alleviate the unfairness towards the a priori more risky drivers, Tan et al (2015) proposed the minimisation of the objective function…”
Section: Determining Optimal Relativities Of a Bmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the lack of flexibility in the implementation of BMS, Pitrebois et al (2003) also argued that a single set of optimal relativities applied to all the policyholders, regardless of their a priori risk characteristics, would induce unfairness towards the drivers who are perceived to be more risky relative to the drivers that are less risky on the a priori basis. To alleviate this inadequacy scenario, Tan et al (2015) proposed a generalisation of the Norberg's criterion and analytically derived the optimal relativities under a financial equilibrium constraint first considered by Coene & Doray (1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation