2018 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/wcnc.2018.8376974
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal resource allocation in ultra-low power fog-computing SWIPT-based networks

Abstract: In this paper, we consider a fog computing system consisting of a multi-antenna access point (AP), an ultra-low power (ULP) single antenna device and a fog server. The ULP device is assumed to be capable of both energy harvesting (EH) and information decoding (ID) using a time-switching simultaneous wireless information and power transfer (SWIPT) scheme. The ULP device deploys the harvested energy for ID and either local computing or offloading the computations to the fog server depending on which strategy is … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [45], the power minimization problem was studied in a SWIPT-aided fog computing networks with dog offloading, where however, the fog server was just used to assign tasks rather than participate in computing. In [46], the authors studied the optimal resource allocation in ultra-low power fog-computing SWIPT-based networks, where however, only the TS receiver architecture was adopted and only single-user was considered. In [47], the authors extended the work in [46] to a multi-user scenario, but it still only studied the TS receiver architecture.…”
Section: B Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In [45], the power minimization problem was studied in a SWIPT-aided fog computing networks with dog offloading, where however, the fog server was just used to assign tasks rather than participate in computing. In [46], the authors studied the optimal resource allocation in ultra-low power fog-computing SWIPT-based networks, where however, only the TS receiver architecture was adopted and only single-user was considered. In [47], the authors extended the work in [46] to a multi-user scenario, but it still only studied the TS receiver architecture.…”
Section: B Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [46], the authors studied the optimal resource allocation in ultra-low power fog-computing SWIPT-based networks, where however, only the TS receiver architecture was adopted and only single-user was considered. In [47], the authors extended the work in [46] to a multi-user scenario, but it still only studied the TS receiver architecture. In [48], the power minimization problem was investigated in SWIPTaware fog computing system with PS receiver architecture, where however, only single-user was considered.…”
Section: B Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A few recent works began to study SWIPTaware fog computing systems. In [10] and [11], the energy consumption was minimized by adopting time switching (TS) mode and power splitting (PS) mode, respectively, where a user was powered by an energy access point and then the tasks were offloaded to a fog server. In [12], the energy consumption was minimized by optimizing power, time and data allocation, where multiple users were considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, in existing works, see e.g. [10]- [11], only single type of users or single user were studied. That is, only EH users, PS users or TS users were considered in their works.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%