2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2018.09.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Reynolds number for liquid-liquid mixing in helical pipes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The liquid superficial velocity has little influence on the mixing result, whereas the main increase in mixing coefficient is related to the gas superficial velocity. The single-phase case has a well-known (Mansour et al 2019(Mansour et al , 2020c) maximum at Re total = 700 , which corresponds to a superficial liquid velocity of u s, l = 0.1756 m∕s , with a mixing coefficient of M c = 0.68 . The highest mixing coefficients of M c > 0.9 in the two-phase experiments were reached with maximum gas velocity ( u s, g = 0.0221 m∕s ) and liquid velocities of 0.075 m∕s < u s, l < 0.176 m∕s , corresponding to total Reynolds numbers of 388 < Re total < 788 (light blue region in Fig.…”
Section: Mixing Pattern and Mixing Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The liquid superficial velocity has little influence on the mixing result, whereas the main increase in mixing coefficient is related to the gas superficial velocity. The single-phase case has a well-known (Mansour et al 2019(Mansour et al , 2020c) maximum at Re total = 700 , which corresponds to a superficial liquid velocity of u s, l = 0.1756 m∕s , with a mixing coefficient of M c = 0.68 . The highest mixing coefficients of M c > 0.9 in the two-phase experiments were reached with maximum gas velocity ( u s, g = 0.0221 m∕s ) and liquid velocities of 0.075 m∕s < u s, l < 0.176 m∕s , corresponding to total Reynolds numbers of 388 < Re total < 788 (light blue region in Fig.…”
Section: Mixing Pattern and Mixing Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mixing was examined numerically in the HCTR geometry, using the fluid properties of the TMS, and in geometry G1, applying the water fluid properties, with parameter variations of the pitch b and the curvature ratio . Similar to former investigations, the CFD code Star-CCM + was used [12,[19][20][21].…”
Section: Mixing Inside the Liquid Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Responsible for this intensified mixing characteristics and also for the enhanced mass transfer, as will be shown in the next section, are the secondary flow pattern inside the helical tube. These Dean-vortices can be visualized from 3D-velocity measurements [17] and from the calculated velocity fields [21] as shown in Fig. 7.…”
Section: Mixing Inside the Liquid Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) has emerged as an attractive tool to study the process intensification by means of Dean vortices reacting systems. The impact of Dean vortices in microsystems has been studied by CFD to evaluate the pressure drop [29,30], the heat transfer [31,32] and to predict the mixing intensification in coiled flow inverters [33,34,35,36] and helical micromixers [37,38]. However, fluid dynamics simulations in high aspect ratio coiled microreactors (length to diameter ratio) remain computationally challenging, due to the mesh refinement needed to capture the geometric curvatures of the reactor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%