Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Real-Time Networks and Systems 2019
DOI: 10.1145/3356401.3356415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal routing and scheduling of complemental flows in converged networks

Abstract: Converged networks support applications with completely different (real-time) requirements. The communication paradigms offered in converged networks are predominantly treated as separate entities from the perspective of traffic engineering, e.g., time-triggered traffic for closed-loop control systems, shaped traffic for multimediastreaming applications, and best-effort traffic for non-time-critical IT applications. However, there are scenarios where applications benefit from considering time-triggered message… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…runtime and schedulability. For example, for meshed networks, it is intuitive to expect better results with more candidate paths at the price of longer runtimes [37], but we expect a diminishing return with regard to the number of candidate paths due to shared sub-paths on the k-shortest paths. Therefore, we use 3-5 candidate paths per flow, which already yields a very high schedulability in our evaluations (similar to [16]).…”
Section: A Setup and Parametersmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…runtime and schedulability. For example, for meshed networks, it is intuitive to expect better results with more candidate paths at the price of longer runtimes [37], but we expect a diminishing return with regard to the number of candidate paths due to shared sub-paths on the k-shortest paths. Therefore, we use 3-5 candidate paths per flow, which already yields a very high schedulability in our evaluations (similar to [16]).…”
Section: A Setup and Parametersmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Additionally, we also implemented an adapted version of a recently proposed, typical ILP [14] for the traffic planning problem to compare the conflict-graph based traffic planning approach to a constraint-based approach which operates directly in the domain of network and streams. We adapted the ILP to use the same system model of the traffic planning problem as CGTP, i.e., multiple candidate paths are considered, and we use a time-discretization to model temporal constraints.…”
Section: B Evaluation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The constraint-based programming approaches either consider only the scheduling aspect [10], [11], or scheduling and routing [12]- [14]. In these approaches, a set of constraints is formulated using the respective framework (satisfiability modulo theories, array coding, integer linear programming) in the domain of the network problem, e.g., constraints directly restrict the transmission schedule or the paths of packets.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%