2016 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/isit.2016.7541265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal sample complexity for stable matrix recovery

Abstract: Tremendous efforts have been made to study the theoretical and algorithmic aspects of sparse recovery and low-rank matrix recovery. This paper fills a theoretical gap in matrix recovery: the optimal sample complexity for stable recovery without constants or log factors. We treat sparsity, low-rankness, and potentially other parsimonious structures within the same framework: constraint sets that have small covering numbers or Minkowski dimensions. We consider three types of random measurement matrices (unstruct… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To position BGPC in a more broad context, it is a special bilinear inverse problem [5], which in turn is a special case of low-rank matrix recovery from incomplete measurements [24], [25], [26], [27]. A resurgence of interest in bilinear inverse problems was pioneered by the recent studies in single-channel blind deconvolution of signals with subspace or sparsity structures, where both the signal and the filter are structured [28], [29], [30], [31], [32].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To position BGPC in a more broad context, it is a special bilinear inverse problem [5], which in turn is a special case of low-rank matrix recovery from incomplete measurements [24], [25], [26], [27]. A resurgence of interest in bilinear inverse problems was pioneered by the recent studies in single-channel blind deconvolution of signals with subspace or sparsity structures, where both the signal and the filter are structured [28], [29], [30], [31], [32].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%