2021
DOI: 10.3390/land10070677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Sampling Intensity in South Korea for a Land-Use Change Matrix Using Point Sampling

Abstract: To report changes in land use, the forestry sector, and land-use change matrix (LUCM), monitoring is necessary in South Korea to adequately respond to the Post-2020 climate regime. To calculate the greenhouse gas statistics observing the principle of transparency required by the Climate Change Convention, a consistent nationwide land-use classification and LUCM are required. However, in South Korea, land-use information is available from the 5th National Forest Inventory conducted in 2006 onwards; therefore, d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the predicted cropland area decreases below the least cultivated land area (LCLA) target (Text S7) after 2058 using the conventional method, whereas this phenomenon does not occur in the DLUCP model (Figure S17b). The LCLA target is another regulation besides PBF, which was put forward in the National Land Use Planning Outline to ensure food security in China, which cannot be disrupted unless of necessary construction requirements. ,, Linear extrapolation was used to predict the changes of the LCLA target because it is widely used in land-use change prediction studies, which is convenient and free of using too many data. The improvement of the DLUCP model compared to the conventional method could be explained by the fact that the PBF constraint in the DLUCP model was refined to each SCU rather than using only the overall PBF constraint in the conventional method. Thus, all the SCUs would satisfy the requirement of the PBF constraint, and the predicted results would be more realistic.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the predicted cropland area decreases below the least cultivated land area (LCLA) target (Text S7) after 2058 using the conventional method, whereas this phenomenon does not occur in the DLUCP model (Figure S17b). The LCLA target is another regulation besides PBF, which was put forward in the National Land Use Planning Outline to ensure food security in China, which cannot be disrupted unless of necessary construction requirements. ,, Linear extrapolation was used to predict the changes of the LCLA target because it is widely used in land-use change prediction studies, which is convenient and free of using too many data. The improvement of the DLUCP model compared to the conventional method could be explained by the fact that the PBF constraint in the DLUCP model was refined to each SCU rather than using only the overall PBF constraint in the conventional method. Thus, all the SCUs would satisfy the requirement of the PBF constraint, and the predicted results would be more realistic.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%