2012
DOI: 10.1002/sim.5474
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal screening schedules for prevention of metastatic cancer

Abstract: We develop methodological, mathematical, statistical, and computational approaches to constructing schedules of cancer screening that maximize the probability that by the time of primary tumor detection it has not yet metastasized. Solving this problem is based on a comprehensive mechanistic model of cancer progression. We apply the model with realistic parameters and the screening optimization methodology to mammographic screening for breast cancer within the American female population. We uncover some genera… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In current public health policy, a more or less "onesize-fits-all" approach using population average risk estimates has been used in natural history Markov models to assess optimal screening ages and intervals to help inform screening guidelines (Winawer et al 2006;de Koning et al 2014). Additionally, other mathematical models for optimizing screening schedules take a more evolutionary approach by incorporating stochastic premalignant and malignant clonal expansions explicitly (Jeon et al 2008;Hanin and Pavlova 2013;Curtius et al 2015;Kroep et al 2017). Although case-control studies aim to identify "who" benefits most from treatment during a set surveillance screen schedule, the goal of this modeling is to predict "when" and at what intervals should premalignant patients return to the clinic during follow-up.…”
Section: Evolution Of Premalignant Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In current public health policy, a more or less "onesize-fits-all" approach using population average risk estimates has been used in natural history Markov models to assess optimal screening ages and intervals to help inform screening guidelines (Winawer et al 2006;de Koning et al 2014). Additionally, other mathematical models for optimizing screening schedules take a more evolutionary approach by incorporating stochastic premalignant and malignant clonal expansions explicitly (Jeon et al 2008;Hanin and Pavlova 2013;Curtius et al 2015;Kroep et al 2017). Although case-control studies aim to identify "who" benefits most from treatment during a set surveillance screen schedule, the goal of this modeling is to predict "when" and at what intervals should premalignant patients return to the clinic during follow-up.…”
Section: Evolution Of Premalignant Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we applied such models to optimize screening and surveillance. Three examples of modeling techniques that could be formally assessed for screening timing include Markov models for natural history of disease [40, 41, 42], biologically-based models that incorporate dynamic processes like clonal expansions and biomarker shedding [18, 19, 22, 25, 43, 44], and biological event timing models that infer ordered genetic events [45]. While utilizing different data types, these all include distinct stages of latency periods separated by rate-limiting events on a patient’s forecasted trajectory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several previous studies address optimal screening design via biomathematical modeling [18, 19, 23, 46], but this study targeted cancer precursors specifically and allowed for this flexible weighting of events to determine the specific age to screen (and whether to screen) in an analytical framework that does not require simulation. Microsimulation studies using models have also been used to inform policy-making decisions on clinical recommendations/modalities, for example in colorectal cancer [47] and lung cancer [40] screening, by the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We have not addressed the issue of scheduling (setting the frequency of) screening . We point out though that scheduling indirectly affects classification rules in screening.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%