9Cancer screening and early detection efforts have been partially successful in reducing incidence and 10 mortality but many improvements are needed. Although current medical practice is mostly informed by 11 epidemiological studies, the decisions for guidelines are ultimately made ad hoc. We propose that quantitative 12 optimization of protocols can potentially increase screening success and reduce overdiagnosis. Mathematical 13 modeling of the stochastic process of cancer evolution can be used to derive and to optimize the timing of 14 clinical screens so that the probability is maximal that a patient is screened within a certain "window of 15 opportunity" for intervention when early cancer development may be observable. Alternative to a strictly 16 empirical approach, or microsimulations of a multitude of possible scenarios, biologically-based mechanistic 17 modeling can be used for predicting when best to screen and begin adaptive surveillance. We introduce a 18 methodology for optimizing screening, assessing potential risks, and quantifying associated costs to healthcare 19 using multiscale models. As a case study in Barrett's esophagus (BE), we applied our methods for a model 20 of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) that was previously calibrated to US cancer registry data. We found 21 optimal screening ages for patients with symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease to be older (58 for 22 men, 64 for women) than what is currently recommended (age > 50 years). These ages are in a cost-effective 23 range to start screening and were independently validated by data used in current guidelines. Our framework 24 captures critical aspects of cancer evolution within BE patients for a more personalized screening design.
25Significance: Our study demonstrates how mathematical modeling of cancer evolution can be used to 26 optimize screening regimes. Surveillance regimes could also be improved if they were based on these models.Ideally, a sensitive clinical screen will be offered to a patient during an opportunistic age window such that some event A (e.g., premalignant disease onset) has likely already occurred but an event B (e.g., cancer detection) has not yet happened. The rates of these events can depend on various risk factors (e.g., sex, ethnicity, environmental exposures) but the derivation of timing is universal. To maximize the probability that a patient is between T A and T B years of age at time of screening/surveillance t s is equivalent to simultaneously (1) maximizing Pr[T A ≤ t s ] to ensure that event A has already occurred while (2) minimizing Pr[T B ≤ t s , T A ≤ t s ] so that screens are not recommended when it is too late for an early intervention. This idea is reflected mathematically in the following relationships, which we will use in the optimal screen design methodology for quantifying 'screening success'.· Optimal screening age for some weight w on an adverse outcome, before time of patient death· Overdiagnosis rate -detecting precursor that will not become cancer by end of follow-up· Succe...